Open Access

Dbx1b defines the dorsal habenular progenitor domain in the zebrafish epithalamus

  • Benjamin J Dean2,
  • Begum Erdogan1,
  • Joshua T Gamse1, 2 and
  • Shu-Yu Wu1Email author
Neural Development20149:20

https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8104-9-20

Received: 3 June 2014

Accepted: 1 September 2014

Published: 12 September 2014

Abstract

Background

The conserved habenular nuclei function as a relay system connecting the forebrain with the brain stem. They play crucial roles in various cognitive behaviors by modulating cholinergic, dopaminergic and serotonergic activities. Despite the renewed interest in this conserved forebrain region because of its importance in regulating aversion and reward behaviors, the formation of the habenular nuclei during embryogenesis is poorly understood due to their small size and deep location in the brain, as well as the lack of known markers for habenular progenitors. In zebrafish, the bilateral habenular nuclei are subdivided into dorsal and ventral compartments, are particularly large and found on the dorsal surface of the brain, which facilitates the study of their development.

Results

Here we examine the expression of a homeodomain transcription factor, dbx1b, and its potential to serve as an early molecular marker of dorsal habenular progenitors. Detailed spatiotemporal expression profiles demonstrate that the expression domain of dbx1b correlates with the presumptive habenular region, and dbx1b-expressing cells are proliferative along the ventricle. A lineage-tracing experiment using the Cre-lox system confirms that all or almost all dorsal habenular neurons are derived from dbx1 b-expressing cells. In addition, mutant analysis and pharmacological treatments demonstrate that both initiation and maintenance of dbx1b expression requires precise regulation by fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling.

Conclusions

We provide clear evidence in support of dbx1b marking the progenitor populations that give rise to the dorsal habenulae. In addition, the expression of dbx1b in the dorsal diencephalon is tightly controlled by FGF signaling.

Background

The habenular nuclei (habenulae) develop in the dorsal diencephalon of vertebrates. These bilaterally paired nuclei receive inputs from the limbic system and basal ganglia and send outputs to dopaminergic and serotonergic centers. Despite their small size, these nuclei play crucial roles in regulating aversion and reward behaviors [1]. Moreover, the fact that the habenulae are a nexus for monoamine circuits highlights the importance of this brain region for studies of neuromodulation and multi-circuit integration.

The habenular nuclei can be divided into two functionally distinct subnuclei alternately referred to as medial and lateral (mammals) or dorsal and ventral (zebrafish) subnuclei. Recent study of the habenulae has largely focused on the ventral habenulae, but interest in the dorsal habenulae is increasing [2]. Alterations in dorsal habenular structure and function during development have been linked to dopamine receptor expression as well as impulsivity, attention, aversion and spatial memory endophenotypes in rodents [3, 4]. In zebrafish, the dorsal habenulae regulate fear and aversion [5, 6]. Together these studies implicate the dorsal habenulae as a possible mediator of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression and anxiety [2]. Interestingly, the dorsal habenulae are also sites of intense acetylcholine receptor and transporter expression and control nicotine intake [79]. This raises the possibility of targeting the habenulae as a therapeutic intervention to nicotine addiction. Beyond translational research, the zebrafish habenulae also serve as an excellent model to study the basic mechanisms underlying the development of left-right brain asymmetry. Unlike the mammalian habenulae, teleost dorsal habenulae are robustly asymmetric in anatomy, gene expression and functional connectivity [10].

Interest in how the dorsal habenulae integrate into cholinergic and monoaminergic circuitry has put pressure on researchers to understand dorsal habenular development. Indeed, Beretta et al. [11] have shown that dorsal and ventral habenular neurons arise from distinct progenitor populations. While progress has been made in describing habenular neurogenesis, differentiation and elaboration of processes, there are no known markers for habenular progenitors [1216]. Therefore, finding marker genes that label dorsal habenular progenitors will be fundamental to studying how the diverse set of dorsal habenular neurons are generated and integrated into neural circuits underpinning aversive behavior as well as pathological addictive and depressive behaviors.

The dbx homeodomain transcription factors play a central role in regulating progenitor status in several regions in the developing central nervous system, including the spinal cord [17, 18]. However, the upstream regulatory pathways that regulate dbx gene-family expression are not known. Here we report that in zebrafish, dbx1b is expressed in the dorsal diencephalon where it marks dorsal habenular progenitors, and further, that dorsal diencephalic expression of dbx1b is controlled by fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling.

Results and discussion

Dbx1b is expressed in the presumptive habenulae

During our ongoing efforts to characterize transcription factors (TFs) that are expressed in the dorsal diencephalic region between 24 and 48 hours post-fertilization (hpf), we focused on a family of homeodomain-containing TFs encoded by the dbx genes because of their known roles in neural progenitors. There are three dbx genes in the zebrafish genome, and we carefully examined the expression pattern of the two dbx1 paralogs, dbx1a and dbx1b. We excluded dbx2 from our study because its expression has been detailed previously [19]. At 28 hpf, dbx1a and dbx1b showed similar yet distinct expression patterns (Additional file 1). As shown previously [20], dbx1a was expressed in sharply restricted domains in the diencephalon with prominent expression in the prethalamus and thalamus (Additional file 1: panel A). Expression of dbx1a and dbx1b was similar in the prethalamic region, but in the thalamic region dbx1b was expressed at a much lower level than dbx1a (Additional file 1; panel C). A more striking difference between the patterns of these two paralogs was the expression of dbx1b in the dorsal diencephalon, where dbx1a was completely absent (compare arrowheads in Additional file 1). Expression of dbx1b was excluded from the otx5-positive pineal complex, the other major structure of the dorsal diencephalon (Additional file 1, panel C). These data suggested that dbx1b could be an early molecular marker for the presumptive habenulae.

Next, we closely examined the expression of dbx1b at different developmental stages (Figure 1). At 22 hpf, expression of dbx1b was not yet present in the presumptive habenular region, although the prethalamic and midbrain regions showed strong expression (Figure 1A,B). By 24 hpf, habenular dbx1b expression appeared (Figure 1C,D) and was maintained through at least 96 hpf (Figure 1E-J and data not shown). Moreover, dbx1b expression remained highest adjacent to the third ventricle of the brain, and was absent from regions distal to the ventricle by 48 hpf (Figure 1H and 1J; dorsal views). Because neuronal progenitors are often found in regions adjacent to the ventricle in the developing brain, these data led us to speculate that the dbx1b expression pattern includes the progenitors of habenular neurons.
Figure 1

Dbx1b is expressed throughout habenular development. (A-J) Lateral and dorsal views of dbx1b expression (blue) during early brain development. Dorsal diencephalic expression of dbx1b appeared shortly after 22 hpf and continued through 72 hpf (arrowhead). otx5 (red) marks the pineal complex (P). Ob, olfactory bulb; pT, prethalamus; Mb, midbrain. Scale bars are 10 μm.

Dbx1b labels dorsal habenular progenitors

To support the hypothesis that dbx1b-expressing cells represent habenular progenitors, we examined if these cells are proliferative. Indeed, as shown by phospho-histone H3 staining at 32 hpf, the dbx1b-positive cells close to the ventricular surface were proliferative, which was consistent with progenitor cell identity (Figure 2A-D). To see if dbx1b expression is restricted to progenitors we compared the expression of previously described precursor and neuronal habenular markers. Cxcr4b has been proposed as a marker of progenitors as well as post-mitotic habenular precursors [12]. At 36 hpf, a subset of dbx1b-expressing cells co-expressed cxcr4b. Specifically, cxcr4b expression was restricted to the dorsal half of the dbx1b expression domain leaving a ventral region of dbx1b-only expression along the ventricle (Figure 2E-F). At 48 hpf, Elavl3 (also known as HuC) marks post-mitotic neurons. Expression of Elavl3 and dbx1b was more distinct than cxcr4b and dbx1b, with Elavl3 expressed dorsally and laterally while dbx1b was present medially and ventrally along the ventricle (Figure 2G-H). Kctd12.1 and Kctd12.2 mark different populations of differentiated habenular neurons. At 72 hpf, neither showed any overlap with dbx1b expression (Figure 2I-L). Similar results were observed with another habenular differentiation marker, pou4f1 (or brn3a) (data not shown). Together these results indicated that dbx1b expression is maintained in a proliferative population of habenular progenitor cells that reside along the ventricle. Dbx1b expression was absent in fully differentiated neurons, suggesting that dbx1b is downregulated in mature habenular neurons. Thus, we conclude that dbx1b can serve as an early marker to identify habenular progenitors.
Figure 2

Dbx1b marks a proliferative periventricular domain in the epithalamus. (A) A dorsal view of the epithalamus showed dbx1b and phosphohistone H3 (pHH3) expression. (B-D) Coronal optical sections revealed that dbx1b-positive cells are pHH3-positive. (E) A presumptive habenular precursor marker, cxcr4b, showed partial overlaps with dbx1b. Significantly, the co-expression domain (E’) was more dorsolateral while the dbx1b-only domain (E”) was along the ventricle. (F) A dorsal view of dbx1b and cxcr4b co-expression. (G-G”) dbx1b expression showed very little overlap with the neuronal marker Elav3l. (H) A dorsal view of dbx1b- and Elav3l-expressing domains. (I-I” and K-K”) No overlapped expression was observed between dbx1b and markers of differentiated habenular neurons, Kctd12.1 and Kctd12.2. (J and L) Dorsal views of dbx1b- and Kctd12.1/12.2-expressing domains. The ventricle is marked by angled dashed lines. Insets are shown with dashed rectangles. Scale bars are 50 μm.

To substantiate our conclusion that dbx1b is expressed in habenular progenitors, we performed a lineage-tracing experiment using the Cre-lox recombination system. By crossing the TgBAC[dbx1b:Cre-mCherry][21] transgenic line with a reporter line, Tg[−10actb2:LOXP-mCherry-LOXP-nlsEGFP][22], almost all Elavl3-expressing habenular neurons were co-labeled with GFP (Figure 3A-C). Indeed, the only domain expressing GFP but not Elavl3 was found along the ventricle, in an area that coincides with dbx1b transcription (Figure 3D-G). To determine if dbx1b-positive cells give rise to both dorsal and ventral habenular neurons, we compared the lineage-labeled domain with cadps2, a dorsal habenular marker [23]. Almost all lineage-labeled cells were cadps2-positive (Figure 3H-J). The only dbx1b-derived cells (GFP-positive) outside the cadps2 domain were medially located and along the ventricle; none were found laterally in the region of the ventral habenulae. Moreover, we also compared the lineage-labeled domain with the expression domain of aoc1, a known ventral habenular marker [24], and found that these two domains abutted but clearly did not overlap (Figure 3K-M). In conclusion, these results strongly suggested that most if not all post-mitotic dorsal habenular neurons are derived from progenitor cells that express dbx1b prior to their differentiation, confirming that dbx1b is a marker of early dorsal habenular progenitors.
Figure 3

Lineage labeling shows dbx1b -positive cells give rise to only dorsal habenular neurons. (A-C) A dbx1bBAC:cre transgene lineage-labeled (magenta) nearly all Elav3l-positive neurons in the habenulae (cyan). See text for details. The bright area marked with X was due to trapped debris, not actually signal. (D-G) In the same lineage-labeling experiment, an Elav3l-negative domain corresponding the habenular progenitor domain, which is labeled by dbx1b expression (green), was clearly discernible as shown by coronal sections. (H-J) Lineage-labeled cells were restricted within the cadps2-positive dorsal habenular domain except right along the ventricle. (K-M) Lineage-labeled cells were excluded from the aoc1-positive ventral habenulae. Scale bars are 50 μm.

FGF signaling is required for proper development of the dorsal habenulae

FGF signaling has been shown to play critical roles during the development of the zebrafish dorsal diencephalon, particularly in pineal complex specification and parapineal migration [25, 26]. It has been suggested that the development of both the left and right habenulae requires FGF signaling, as shown by the reduced expression of habenular differentiation markers (Kctd12.1, pou4f1) in FGF mutants [26]. However, how the loss of FGF signaling impacts habenular development remains unclear. We found that in fgf8a mutants, in which brain patterning appeared to be normal (Additional file 2), the expression of dbx1b was completely lost at 24 hpf (Figure 4A-D) and this loss of expression persisted at later stages. The latter observation suggested that the loss of FGF-dependent dbx1b is not a result of developmental delay. Therefore, FGF signaling is absolutely required for the initiation of dbx1b expression.
Figure 4

Fgf8a mutants fail to express dbx1b in the epithalamus. (A-D) In situ hybridization for dbx1b (blue) in wildtype and fgf8a mutant embryos. otx5 marks the pineal complex. Scale bars are 10 μm.

To explore the regulatory relationship between FGF signaling and dbx1b in more detail, we investigated if FGF signaling is continuously required to maintain dbx1b-positive habenular progenitors. We took advantage of the FGF receptor antagonist, SU5402, to block FGF signaling in a temporally controlled manner. Since dbx1b expression was first detectable at 24 hpf, the embryos were treated with SU5402 for 8 hours, from either 28 to 36 hpf or 48 to 56 hpf. The expression of dbx1b was analyzed at the end of the treatments as well as after 12 hours of recovery post-treatment. As shown in Figure 5, both treatment regimes abrogated dbx1b expression by the end of the treatment window, yet dbx1b expression began to return after 12 hours of recovery (Figure 5B,D and 4F,H). This result suggests that FGF signaling is required for not only the initiation, but also the maintenance of dbx1b expression. Moreover, at least some neuronal progenitors in the dorsal diencephalon remain FGF-responsive and capable of reactivating dbx1b expression upon exposure to FGF signal, even when they were previously deprived of FGF signaling.
Figure 5

Sustained fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling is required for dbx1b expression. (A-D) Eight-hour treatment of embryos with the FGF receptor antagonist SU5402 abolished dbx1b expression, however expression began to return 12 hours after treatment. (E-H) Similar results were seen when FGF receptor blockade was initiated after dbx1b expression began. Generation of Elav3l-positive habenular cells resumed following drug washout at both early and late time points (D, H). Scale bars are 50 μm.

Conclusions

This report describes the expression of dbx1b, which we believe is the first reported marker of the neuronal progenitors that give rise to the dorsal habenulae. In addition, we found that FGF signaling controls the expression of dbx1b in the dorsal diencephalon. Together with other existing genetic tools, including various dbx1b BAC transgenic lines, our discovery of dbx1b as a habenular progenitor marker will not only allow for more detailed and nuanced investigation of dorsal habenular development, but also provide an exciting way forward to study proliferation, specification and circuit formation of the diverse neuronal populations in the habenular nuclei, and how these processes influence developmental and adult habenulae-mediated behaviors.

Methods

Zebrafish maintenance and strains

Zebrafish were raised at 28.5°C on a 14/10 hour light/dark cycle and staged according to hours post-fertilization. The following fish lines were used: the wildtype strain AB*[27], TgBAC[dbx1b:Cre-mCherry] nns13a [21] and Tg[−10actb2:LOXP-mCherry-LOXP-nlsEGFP] pd31 [22]. All experiments were approved by the Vanderbilt University’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and Office of Animal Welfare, and performed according to national regulatory standards.

Whole-mount in situ hybridization

Whole-mount RNA in situ hybridization was performed as described previously [23], with one change: 5% dextran sulfate was added to the hybridization buffer to enhance hybridization specificity [28]. Hybridized probes were detected using alkaline phosphatase conjugated antibodies (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and visualized by 4-nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT; Roche) and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate (BCIP; Roche) staining for single colorometric labeling, or by NBT/BCIP followed by iodonitrotetrazolium (INT) and BCIP staining for double colorometric labeling. dbx1a probe [17] was produced from pCRII-dbx1a plasmid linearized by EcoRV and transcribed by SP6 RNA polymerase. dbx1b probe [17] using pCRII-dbx1b, BamHI and T7 RNA polymerase, and otx5[29] using pBS-otx5, Not1 and T7 RNA polymerase.

Whole-mount fluorescent in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry

Whole-mount fluorescent in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical co-labeling was performed as described previously [13], with the following additional reagents: in addition to Fast Red substrate (F4648; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA), some experiments used 3 × 5 minute washes in Fast Blue Buffer [28] and were developed in Fast Blue Substrate (0.25 mg/mL Fast Blue Substrate and 0.25 mg/mL nAMP in Fast Blue Buffer) diluted in Fast Blue Buffer. In addition to the anti-digoxigenin (DIG) antibody, the primary antibodies used were rabbit anti-pHH3 (1:500, EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), mouse anti-HuC (1:400, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), rabbit anti-GFP (1:500, Torrey Pines Biolab, Secaucus, NJ, USA), rabbit anti-Kctd12.1 and rabbit anti-Kctd12.2 (1:300, see [30]). Primary antibody was detected using goat-anti-rabbit or goat-anti-mouse antibodies conjugated to Alexa 488, Alexa 568 or Alexa 633 fluorophores (1:300, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA).

Double fluorescent in situ hybridization was performed with the following modifications to the above colorometric in situ protocol: after hybridization of DIG and fluorescein-labeled probes, anti-DIG antibody was applied (1:5,000, Roche) overnight at 4°C. The following day, embryos were washed 4 × 20 minutes in PBS with Triton (PBSTr) and 3 × 5 minutes in Fast Blue Buffer and developed in Fast Blue Substrate diluted in Fast Blue Buffer. After color development, embryos were washed 2 × 10 minutes in PBSTr. The alkaline phosphatase was acid inactivated by a 10-minute wash in 0.1 M glycine HCl, pH 2.0. After 2 × 10 minute PBSTr washes, embryos were incubated in anti-fluorescein antibody (1:1,000, Roche) overnight at 4°C. The following day, color was developed in Fast Red substrate as in Doll et al. [13]. cxcr4b[31] probe was generated with EcoRV and SP6 RNA polymerase.

Inhibitor treatments

For whole-mount in situ hybridizations and antibody labeling, embryos were incubated in their chorions in 12 μM (for complete receptor inhibition; [27]) of SU5402 (Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, UK) dissolved in 0.3% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in egg water supplemented with 0.003% N-phenylthiourea (PTU; Sigma-Aldrich) to prevent melanin formation. Control embryos were treated with 0.3% DMSO in parallel with their SU5402-treated siblings. Embryos were either fixed immediately following treatment or SU5402/DMSO was washed off with 5 × 5 minute egg water before being returned to egg water with PTU to develop to the desired stage for fixation.

Imaging

All samples were cleared in a glycerol series (50%, 100%). Colorometric in situ images were captured on a Leica DM6000 B compound microscope (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) under a 20× air objective in bright field conditions. Fluorescent images were captured on a PerkinElmer spinning disk confocal microscope (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) or a Zeiss LSM 510 Meta confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Oberkochen, Germany) with a 40× oil-immersion objective and analyzed with Volocity software (Improvision/PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA).

Abbreviations

actb2: 

actin, beta 2

ADHD: 

attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

aoc1: 

amine oxidase, copper containing 1

BAC: 

bacterial artificial chromosome

BCIP: 

5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate

cadps2: 

Ca2+-dependent secretion activator 2

cxcr4b: 

chemokine (C-X-C motif), receptor 4b

dbx1b: 

developing brain homeobox 1b

DIG: 

digoxigenin

dpf: 

days post-fertilization

DMSO: 

dimethyl sulfoxide

Elavl3: 

ELAV like neuron-specific RNA binding protein 3

eomesa: 

eomesodermin homolog a

FGF: 

fibroblast growth factor

GFP: 

green fluorescent protein

hpf: 

hours post-fertilization

HuC: 

Hu-antigen C

IACUC: 

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee

Kctd12: 

potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 12

NBT: 

4-nitro blue tetrazolium

INT: 

iodonitrotetrazolium

PBS: 

phosphate-buffered saline

otx5: 

orthodenticle homolog 5

pou4f1: 

POU domain, class 4, transcription factor 1 (also called Brain-specific homeobox/POU domain protein 3a, brn3a)

PTU: 

N-phenylthiourea

shh: 

sonic hedgehog

TFs: 

transcription factors

Tg: 

transgenic

wnt1: 

wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 1

ZLI: 

zona limitans intrathalamica

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Gamse lab members for helpful discussions. We acknowledge the SC Vanderbilt University Fish Facility Research Assistants for excellent fish care. Experiments were performed in part through the use of the VUMC Cell Imaging Shared Resource (supported by NIH grants CA68485, DK20593, DK58404, HD15052, DK59637 and EY08126). This work was supported by Public Health Service award T32 GM07347 from the National Institute of General Medical Studies for the Vanderbilt Medical-Scientist Training Program to BJD, NIH grants F32HD069148 to SW, and R01HD054534 to JTG.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University
(2)
Program in Neuroscience, Vanderbilt University

References

  1. Velasquez KM, Molfese DL, Salas R: The role of the habenula in drug addiction. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014, 8: 174-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Viswanath H, Carter AQ, Baldwin PR, Molfese DL, Salas R: The medial habenula: still neglected. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013, 7: 931-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lee Y-A, Goto Y: Neurodevelopmental disruption of cortico-striatal function caused by degeneration of habenula neurons. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e19450-10.1371/journal.pone.0019450.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kobayashi Y, Sano Y, Vannoni E, Goto H, Suzuki H, Oba A, Kawasaki H, Kanba S, Lipp H-P, Murphy NP, Wolfer DP, Itohara S: Genetic dissection of medial habenula-interpeduncular nucleus pathway function in mice. Front Behav Neurosci. 2013, 7: 17-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Agetsuma M, Aizawa H, Aoki T, Nakayama R, Takahoko M, Goto M, Sassa T, Amo R, Shiraki T, Kawakami K, Hosoya T, Higashijima S-I, Okamoto H: The habenula is crucial for experience-dependent modification of fear responses in zebrafish. Nat Neurosci. 2010, 13: 1354-1356. 10.1038/nn.2654.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mathuru AS, Jesuthasan S: The medial habenula as a regulator of anxiety in adult zebrafish. Front Neural Circuits. 2013, 7: 99-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hong E, Santhakumar K, Akitake CA, Ahn SJ, Thisse C, Thisse B, Wyart C, Mangin J-M, Halpern ME: Cholinergic left-right asymmetry in the habenulo-interpeduncular pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013, 110: 21171-21176. 10.1073/pnas.1319566110.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fowler CD, Lu Q, Johnson PM, Marks MJ, Kenny PJ: Habenular α5 nicotinic receptor subunit signalling controls nicotine intake. Nature. 2011, 471: 597-601. 10.1038/nature09797.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Frahm S, Slimak MA, Ferrarese L, Santos-Torres J, Antolin-Fontes B, Auer S, Filkin S, Pons S, Fontaine J-F, Tsetlin V, Maskos U, Ibañez-Tallon I: Aversion to nicotine is regulated by the balanced activity of β4 and α5 nicotinic receptor subunits in the medial habenula. Neuron. 2011, 70: 522-535. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.04.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bianco IH, Wilson SW: The habenular nuclei: a conserved asymmetric relay station in the vertebrate brain. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009, 364: 1005-1020. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0213.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Beretta CA, Dross N, Bankhead P, Carl M: The ventral habenulae of zebrafish develop in prosomere 2 dependent on Tcf7l2 function. Neural Dev. 2013, 8: 19-10.1186/1749-8104-8-19.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Roussigné M, Bianco IH, Wilson SW, Blader P: Nodal signalling imposes left-right asymmetry upon neurogenesis in the habenular nuclei. Development. 2009, 136: 1549-1557. 10.1242/dev.034793.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Doll CA, Burkart JT, Hope KD, Halpern ME, Gamse JT: Subnuclear development of the zebrafish habenular nuclei requires ER translocon function. Dev Biol. 2011, 360: 44-57.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Aizawa H, Goto M, Sato T, Okamoto H: Temporally regulated asymmetric neurogenesis causes left-right difference in the zebrafish habenular structures. Dev Cell. 2007, 12: 87-98. 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.10.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. DeCarvalho TN, Subedi A, Rock J, Harfe BD, Thisse C: Neurotransmitter map of the asymmetric dorsal habenular nuclei of zebrafish. Genesis. 2014, 52: 1-42. 10.1002/dvg.22728.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Taylor RW, Qi JY, Talaga AK, Ma TP, Pan L, Bartholomew CR, Klionsky DJ, Moens CB, Gamse JT: Asymmetric inhibition of Ulk2 causes left-right differences in habenular neuropil formation. J Neurosci. 2011, 31: 9869-9878. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0435-11.2011.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gribble SL, Nikolaus OB, Dorsky RI: Regulation and function of Dbx genes in the zebrafish spinal cord. Dev Dyn. 2007, 236: 3472-3483. 10.1002/dvdy.21367.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Vue TY, Aaker J, Taniguchi A, Kazemzadeh C, Skidmore JM, Martin DM, Martin JF, Treier M, Nakagawa Y: Characterization of progenitor domains in the developing mouse thalamus. J Comp Neurol. 2007, 505: 73-91. 10.1002/cne.21467.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Seo H-C, Nilsen F, Fjose A: Three structurally and functionally conserved Hlx genes in zebrafish. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999, 1489: 323-335. 10.1016/S0167-4781(99)00187-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lauter G, Söll I, Hauptmann G: Molecular characterization of prosomeric and intraprosomeric subdivisions of the embryonic zebrafish diencephalon. J Comp Neurol. 2013, 521: 1093-1118. 10.1002/cne.23221.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Koyama M, Kinkhabwala A, Satou C, Higashijima S, Fetcho J: Mapping a sensory-motor network onto a structural and functional ground plan in the hindbrain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011, 108: 1-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kikuchi K, Holdway JE, Werdich AA, Anderson RM, Fang Y, Egnaczyk GF, Evans T, Macrae CA, Stainier DYR, Poss KD: Primary contribution to zebrafish heart regeneration by gata4(+) cardiomyocytes. Nature. 2010, 464: 601-605. 10.1038/nature08804.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gamse JT: The parapineal mediates left-right asymmetry in the zebrafish diencephalon. Development. 2003, 130: 1059-1068. 10.1242/dev.00270.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Amo R, Aizawa H, Takahoko M, Kobayashi M, Takahashi R, Aoki T, Okamoto H: Identification of the zebrafish ventral habenula as a homolog of the mammalian lateral habenula. J Neurosci. 2010, 30: 1566-1574. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3690-09.2010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Clanton JA, Hope KD, Gamse JT: Fgf signaling governs cell fate in the zebrafish pineal complex. Development. 2013, 140: 323-332. 10.1242/dev.083709.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Regan JC, Concha ML, Roussigne M, Russell C, Wilson SW: An Fgf8-dependent bistable cell migratory event establishes CNS asymmetry. Neuron. 2009, 61: 27-34. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.11.030.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Walker C: Haploid screens and gamma-ray mutagenesis. Methods Cell Biol. 1999, 60: 43-70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lauter G, Söll I, Hauptmann G: Multicolor fluorescent in situ hybridization to define abutting and overlapping gene expression in the embryonic zebrafish brain. Neural Dev. 2011, 6: 10-10.1186/1749-8104-6-10.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gamse JT, Shen Y-C, Thisse C, Thisse B, Raymond PA, Halpern ME, Liang JO: Otx5 regulates genes that show circadian expression in the zebrafish pineal complex. Nat Genet. 2002, 30: 117-121. 10.1038/ng793.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gamse JT, Kuan Y-S, Macurak M, Brösamle C, Thisse B, Thisse C, Halpern ME: Directional asymmetry of the zebrafish epithalamus guides dorsoventral innervation of the midbrain target. Development. 2005, 132: 4869-4881. 10.1242/dev.02046.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Chong SW, Emelyanov A, Gong Z, Korzh V: Expression pattern of two zebrafish genes, cxcr4a and cxcr4b. Mech Dev. 2001, 109: 347-354. 10.1016/S0925-4773(01)00520-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Dean et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement