Skip to main content

Table 2 Top 10 differentially regulated transcripts 2 days post transection

From: Genome-wide expression profile of the response to spinal cord injury in Xenopus laevis reveals extensive differences between regenerative and non-regenerative stages

GenBank ID Gene name UniGene cluster description log2FC FC ratio
   R2 NR2
BC078115 hsp70 Heat shock 70 kDa protein -0.65 4.22 29.26
BC070531 MGC78829 Hypothetical protein MGC78829 -2.22 2.51 26.66
BC068675 cnfn-a Cornifelin -1.81 2.85 25.19
BC141766 LOC100049771 Hypothetical protein LOC100049771 1.39 5.32 15.26
BC157718 cfos-A C-fos proto-oncogene -1.88 1.73 12.19
BC129680 sds Serine dehydratase -1.72 1.73 10.93
BC084644 hla-dqa1 Major histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ alpha 1 -2.52 0.68 9.21
BC167488 LOC495461 Hypothetical LOC495461 -2.01 1.16 8.99
BC044682 ucp2 Uncoupling protein 2 (mitochondrial, proton carrier) -1.00 2.07 8.44
AB075925 olfm4 Olfactomedin 4 -0.35 2.32 6.36
  1. Top 10 transcripts that, in addition to being differentially expressed after injury, show a different response when comparing regenerative and non-regenerative stages. Selection criteria: P < 0.01; sum of reads (transected + sham) higher or equal to the mean value of all transcripts. FC ratio: ratio between FC(R)/FC(NR) or FC(NR)/FC(R) (see Figure 2b for selection criteria). FC, fold change (transected/sham).