Skip to main content

Table 1 Top 10 differentially regulated transcripts 1 day post transection

From: Genome-wide expression profile of the response to spinal cord injury in Xenopus laevis reveals extensive differences between regenerative and non-regenerative stages

GenBank ID Gene name UniGene cluster description log2FC FC ratio
  R1 NR1
BC070531 MGC78829 Hypothetical protein MGC78829 -1.06 4.15 36.92
BC129680 sds Serine dehydratase -3.27 1.92 36.51
BC076749 stc1 Stanniocalcin 1 5.07 0.31 27.06
BC129695 LOC100036942 Hypothetical protein LOC100036942 -2.20 1.63 14.18
NM_001092398 glul-a Glutamate-ammonia ligase -2.28 1.51 13.76
BC073470 glul-b Glutamate-ammonia ligase -1.98 1.61 12.09
BC070543 aqp3-a Aquaporin 3 (Gill blood group) 3.99 0.49 11.29
BC084414 bhmt Betaine-homocysteine S-methyltransferase -0.98 2.37 10.20
BC041489 Unknown Xenopus laevis, clone IMAGE:4930284, mRNA -1.48 1.26 6.70
BC044682 ucp2 Uncoupling protein 2 (mitochondrial, proton carrier) -0.80 1.94 6.69
  1. Top 10 transcripts that, in addition to being differentially expressed after injury, show a different response when comparing regenerative and non-regenerative stages. Selection criteria: P < 0.01; sum of reads (transected + sham) higher or equal to the mean value of all transcripts. FC ratio: ratio between FC(R)/FC(NR) or FC(NR)/FC(R) (see Figure 2b for selection criteria). FC, fold change (transected/sham).
Back to article page

Neural Development

ISSN: 1749-8104