Skip to main content
Figure 7 | Neural Development

Figure 7

From: Structural distinctions in BMPs underlie divergent signaling in spinal neurons

Figure 7

Model of mechanism of BMP selectivity in axon orienting ability. (A-D) Ball and stick structural representations of BMP7, BMP6 and BMP7 bound to the AcRIIA ECD. The images were generated with Cn3D v4.3 software (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), shown at low and high magnification. (A) Views of the BMP7 monomer (PDB: 1LX1, [23] focusing on the region containing Arg48 (residue highlighted in yellow). (B) Views of the BMP6 monomer (PDB: 2R52, [33]) in the proximity of Gln48 (yellow). (C) Enlargement and overlay of the boxed areas in the lower panels in A and B illustrating the differences in the configuration of residues in this region: for BMP7, Arg48 and Glu60 (blue); for BMP6, Gln48 (red) and Lys60 (brown). The arrangement of residues in this region is likely to influence binding specificity and subsequent functional outcomes. (D) High magnification view of the BMP7/ActRIIA ECD complex (PDB: 1LX5; [23]. BMP7 is rotated with respect to the view in A to illustrate the predicted interaction of Arg48 in BMP7 and Lys76 in ActRIIA. (E) Axon orientation and growth cone collapse is evoked by BMP7 but not by BMP6 and involves signaling dependent on PI3K [9] and, by analogy with BMP7-evoked monocyte chemotaxis [8], likely depends on activation of ActRIIA. Our model proposes that BMP7 and other orienting BMPs are able selectively to activate a receptor complex comprising ActRIIA, BMPRII and BMPRIB (see [8, 9, 13]) but that Gln48 in BMP6 prevents interaction with this complex. (F) The induction pathway, activated by both BMP7 and BMP6, and all other BMPs, leads to stimulation of the Smad cascade and induction of target genes. This transduction mechanism has a high threshold for activity, is not selectively dependent on any of the type II BMPRs [8, 9] and is unaffected by chimeric BMPs that alter orienting activity.

Back to article page