Type I vs type II spiral ganglion neurons exhibit differential survival and neuritogenesis during cochlear development
© Barclay et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 23 June 2011
Accepted: 11 October 2011
Published: 11 October 2011
The mechanisms that consolidate neural circuitry are a major focus of neuroscience. In the mammalian cochlea, the refinement of spiral ganglion neuron (SGN) innervation to the inner hair cells (by type I SGNs) and the outer hair cells (by type II SGNs) is accompanied by a 25% loss of SGNs.
We investigated the segregation of neuronal loss in the mouse cochlea using β-tubulin and peripherin antisera to immunolabel all SGNs and selectively type II SGNs, respectively, and discovered that it is the type II SGN population that is predominately lost within the first postnatal week. Developmental neuronal loss has been attributed to the decline in neurotrophin expression by the target hair cells during this period, so we next examined survival of SGN sub-populations using tissue culture of the mid apex-mid turn region of neonatal mouse cochleae. In organotypic culture for 48 hours from postnatal day 1, endogenous trophic support from the organ of Corti proved sufficient to maintain all type II SGNs; however, a large proportion of type I SGNs were lost. Culture of the spiral ganglion as an explant, with removal of the organ of Corti, led to loss of the majority of both SGN sub-types. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) added as a supplement to the media rescued a significant proportion of the SGNs, particularly the type II SGNs, which also showed increased neuritogenesis. The known decline in BDNF production by the rodent sensory epithelium after birth is therefore a likely mediator of type II neuron apoptosis.
Our study thus indicates that BDNF supply from the organ of Corti supports consolidation of type II innervation in the neonatal mouse cochlea. In contrast, type I SGNs likely rely on additional sources for trophic support.
Development of the nervous system is characterized by the pruning of inappropriate contacts through synapse elimination , axon retraction  and by apoptosis of neurons [3, 4]. In the cochlea, these processes refine afferent innervation of the sensory hair cells during early development, resulting in the precise pattern of innervation observed in the adult.
The mature mammalian cochlea exhibits segregated innervation of its two populations of sensory hair cells by the spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs), the primary auditory neurons. Type I SGNs comprise 90 to 95% of the SGN population and 10 to 20 of these neurons extend single, unbranched, myelinated neurites to exclusively innervate a single inner hair cell (IHC). The IHCs with their highly convergent and exclusively type I SGN innervation are responsible for encoding sound stimuli. The remaining 5 to 10% of SGNs are type II neurons that extend thin, unmyelinated fibers that innervate numerous outer hair cells (OHCs) in an en passant fashion. Auditory coding from the type II SGNs has not been determined but it is thought to signal the operating point of the 'cochlear amplifier' or active enhancement of sound transduction that is associated with the OHC [5, 6]. This highly conserved afferent innervation of IHCs and OHCs is established during the first postnatal week of development in rodents. Type I arbors, which initially project to both hair cell types, withdraw from the OHC region and from adjacent IHCs to focus on a single IHC [7–11]. Type II fibers lose any contact to the IHC region, turn basally, a process that requires expression of the transcription factor Prox1 , and increase their length five-fold as they extend within the outer spiral bundles beneath the rows of OHCs . This postnatal period is also known to be characterized by apoptosis of approximately 25% of SGNs [13, 14].
Studies in the visual system of chicks show that programmed cell death provides a means of removing neurites that have innervated inappropriate targets  and is thought to arise from restriction of neurotrophin supply from target tissue . In the developing inner ear, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) are necessary for the survival of SGNs [16–18]. Both BDNF and NT-3 are expressed by the sensory hair cells in the developing organ of Corti. In the mouse, NT-3 is broadly expressed in the organ of Corti at birth (with an apically biased gradient), becoming constrained to the inner hair cells and adjacent supporting cells after the onset of hearing (second postnatal week) . At birth, BDNF expression is largely constrained to the IHCs and OHCs  and is then down-regulated from the basal turn upwards, reflecting progressive maturation of the developing organ of Corti [21, 22]. Null mutants for BDNF and NT-3, or their respective TrkB and TrkC receptors, cause a loss of SGNs during embryogenesis [23–25]; disruption of BDNF/TrkB signaling particularly affects type II SGNs and their innervation of OHCs. Knock-in of BDNF expression under the NT-3 promoter  and, conversely, knock-in of NT-3 under the BDNF promoter  indicated that BDNF, or NT-3 substituting for the BDNF spatiotemporal expression profile in the neonatal cochlea, supports both type I and type II SGN survival and the development of the type II SGN innervation of the OHC.
Our study sought to clarify the molecular signaling that determines how the two different populations of primary afferent neurons segregate in the developing cochlea to innervate their respective targets, the IHCs and the OHCs. We utilized the mouse model, which benefits from the selective expression by type II SGNs of peripherin, a type III intermediate filament . By immunolabeling peripherin-positive type II SGNs and comparing this with immunolabeling of both populations of SGNs with an anti-β-tubulin antibody, we were able to determine the fate of the two SGN neuron populations in vivo and in vitro during the critical final resolution of afferent innervation of the cochlea in the first postnatal week, just prior to the onset of hearing. Our findings reveal a differential dependency on BDNF neurotrophic support for survival and neuritogenesis of the type II versus type I spiral ganglion afferent neurons.
In vivo spiral ganglion neuron density
β-Tubulin expression permitted quantification of neuron density for the total SGN population (Figures 2 and 3A), which showed an approximately 25% reduction in density between P1 and P21 (P1 = 497 ± 51 neurons/100 μm3; P7 = 327 ± 11 neurons/100 μm3; P21 = 363 ± 28 neurons/100 μm3; one-way ANOVA, P < 0.01). This significant loss of SGNs occurred between P1 and P7 (post-hoc Holm-Sidak test, P < 0.05). Type I SGNs, which expressed β-tubulin only (Figure 2), showed neuron densities of 376 ± 92 neurons/100 μm3, 312 ± 27 neurons/100 μm3 and 352 ± 28 neurons/100 μm3 for P1, P7 and P21 cochleae, respectively (Figure 3A), and were not significantly different (one-way ANOVA, P = 0.268). Peripherin and β-tubulin immuno-positive type II SGNs (Figure 2), however, showed a marked and significant reduction in neuron density between P1 and P21 (Figure 3A; one-way ANOVA, P < 0.001). Post hoc analyses revealed this significant loss of type II SGNs occurred between P1 and P7, where their density dropped from 121 ± 21 neurons/100 μm3 to 15 ± 3 neurons/100 μm3 (Holm-Sidak test, P < 0.05; 88% loss). No further reduction was observed at P21, when type II SGN density was 15 ± 4 neurons/100 μm3. Thus, the type II SGN population reduces from approximately 26% of all SGNs at P1 to approximately 5% at P7. There was no marked tonotopic effect on neuron density when the density of type I and type II SGNs in each ganglion region was plotted with respect to the distance from the apex (Figure 3B and Figure 3C, respectively). These plots confirm that type I SGNs show very little change in neuron density postnatally (Figure 3B), but the five-fold reduction in the number of type II SGNs noted above occurs within the first postnatal week, across all turns of the cochlea (excluding the very apex, where there are no type II SGNs even at P1) (Figure 3C).
Spiral ganglion survival in vitro
To investigate the pro-survival effect of the organ of Corti on type I and type II SGNs, we assessed the in vivo density of these neuronal sub-types in whole mounts of the mid-apex-mid-turn region of cochleae from P1 (Figure 5A) and P7 (Figure 5E) mice. These densities were compared to those determined for the spiral ganglion following 48 hour culture in control media with the organ of Corti intact (organotypic, Figure 5B,F), or removed (explant - control, Figure 5C,G). The effect of BDNF supplement in the culture media on type I and type II SGN survival was also investigated in SGN explants (explant plus BDNF, Figure 5D,H).
We validated our methods for calculating neuron density by comparing the in vivo density of type I and type II SGNs in the mid-apex-mid-turn region across two different fresh-fixed tissue preparations; mid-modiolar cross-sections (P1, n = 4; P7, n = 5) and whole mount tissue (P1, n = 5; P7, n = 6), where we found no significant difference in neuron density for each SGN sub-type (Figure 5I,J). Forty-eight hour culture of type I SGNs from P1 cochleae with the organ of Corti intact (organotypic, n = 4) or removed (explant, n = 7) yielded significant decreases in neuron density when compared to in vivo densities calculated from whole mount tissue (Figure 5I; whole mount tissue = 506 ± 36 neurons/100 μm3; organotypic = 87 ± 22 neurons/100 μm3; explant = 9 ± 1 neurons/100 μm3; ANOVA, P < 0.001). This loss of neurons arose in both organotypic and explant cultures (P < 0.05, post hoc Holm Sidak test). The application of BDNF to SGN explants (n = 7) improved survival of cultured type I SGNs to 49 ± 9 neurons/100 μm3 when compared to the control explants (Figure 5I; unpaired t-test, P < 0.001). In contrast, at P1, while type II SGNs also showed a significant effect of culture on neuron density (Figure 5I; whole mount tissue = 103 ± 6 neurons/100 μm3; organotypic = 138 ± 34 neurons/100 μm3; explant = 7 ± 2 neurons/100 μm3; ANOVA, P < 0.001), this loss of neuron viability only occurred in the explant condition (P < 0.05, post hoc Holm Sidak test). Thus, retention of the organ of Corti in the organotypic culture preparations provided sufficient support for complete survival of the type II SGN population. The loss of type II SGNs in the explant preparation was rescued by BDNF (Figure 5I; density was increased to 50 ± 8 neurons/100 μm3; unpaired t-test, P < 0.001), or about 50% survival, a considerably higher proportion than the BDNF-mediated rescue of type I SGNs in explants (Figure 5K).
Similar patterns of survival were observed in whole mount (n = 4), organotypic (n = 7) and explant (n = 5) tissue from P7 mice (Figure 5J). Type I SGNs again showed a significant reduction in neuron density with culture (whole mount tissue = 329 ± 32 neurons/100 μm3; organotypic = 143 ± 20 neurons/100 μm3; explant = 20 ± 3 neurons/100 μm3; ANOVA, p < 0.001) that arose in both organotypic and explant cultures (P < 0.05, post hoc Holm Sidak tests). BDNF yielded a significant improvement in type I SGN survival, where an increase of neuron density to 51 ± 6 type I neurons/100 μm3 was observed when compared to control explants (Figure 5J; unpaired t-test, P < 0.01). Type II SGNs also showed a significant effect of culture on neuron density (Figure 5J; whole mount tissue = 22 ± 1 neurons/100 μm3; organotypic = 26 ± 3 neurons/100 μm3; explant = 6 ± 2 neurons/100 μm3; ANOVA, P < 0.001). Again it was the explant cultures that exhibited a significant loss of neurons when compared to the in vivo neuron density (whole mount tissue; P < 0.05, post hoc Holm Sidak test) and culture of type II SGNs with the organ of Corti intact resulted in no significant change in their density, indicating complete protection from type II SGN loss. Culture of P7 SGN explants (no organ of Corti) with BDNF significantly improved type II SGN survival when compared to P7 explant cultures in control growth media (Figure 5J; 11 ± 1 type II neurons/100 μm3; unpaired t-test, P < 0.05). As for experiments with P1 tissue, these P7 experiments again showed that proportionally more type II neurons were rescued by BDNF than type I SGNs (Figure 5L). Further, the complete survival of type II SGNs in the P1 and P7 organotypic cultures validated our in vitro neuronal density quantification.
Spiral ganglion neuron neuritogenesis in vitro
To investigate the effect of BDNF on the length of type I and type II neurites, mean neurite length for these SGN sub-types was calculated for each explant (Figure 6F). Comparison of the mean lengths of type I and type II neurites grown in control growth media were not significantly different, regardless of age. Type I and type II SGN neurites from P1 mice had a mean length of 320 ± 38 μm and 343 ± 38 μm, respectively, and those from P7 mice had a mean length of 481 ± 48 μm and 510 ± 77 μm, respectively. Addition of BDNF to the culture medium stimulated a significant increase in type II neurite length to 569 ± 67 μm in P1 explants (unpaired t-test, P < 0.05) and to 752 ± 50 μm in P7 explants (unpaired t-test, P < 0.05). Type I neurites showed no BDNF-mediated increase in length (354 ± 40 μm at P1 and 600 ± 74 μm at P7; P > 0.05).
Neonatal mouse cochlea provide a unique opportunity in which to distinguish type I and type II SGNs using peripherin as a specific marker for type II SGNs. We show that approximately 25% of neurons at birth are peripherin-positive and therefore type II SGNs. The apical-most half turn of the mouse cochlea did not contain peripherin-immunolabeled type II SGNs, in agreement with previous studies [36, 37]. Our results also agree with the previous study by Huang et al.  that first demonstrated the specificity of peripherin immunolabeling in the mouse cochlear type II SGN from embryonic day 18. As shown by Huang et al., the peripherin-positive (type II SGN) neurites, which project beyond the floor of the tunnel of Corti to the OHCs, formed distinctly separate fascicles from the transient innervation of the OHCs by the peripherin-negative type I SGNs in the first postnatal week. This reflects a species difference, as in the neonatal rat model, peripherin expression occurs in type I as well as type II SGNs [36, 31]. We are also confident that peripherin expression remained confined to the type II SGNs following axotomy and culture, despite previous reports of in vitro peripherin re-expression in type I SGNs from rat cochlea following axotomy and culture of SGN explants  and in vivo following degeneration of the organ of Corti in response to neomycin treatment . In particular, we did not observe peripherin expression in fibers innervating IHCs in our organotypic cultures from P7 cochleae, by which age the IHC innervation is exclusively from type I SGNs . Additionally, the density of peripherin-expressing type II SGNs in these cultures matched the in vivo state, again suggesting that type I SGNs in our cultures did not start to express peripherin. It is highly unlikely that exactly sufficient numbers of type I SGN could start to express peripherin, to balance putative loss of type II SGN, so that the peripherin-expressing neuron population remained unchanged. It is also highly unlikely that such a process would exactly match different proportional loss of type II SGNs at P1 versus P7. These findings are corroborated by previous studies in neonatal mouse cultures, where peripherin was never observed in type I fibers innervating the IHCs in organotypic cultures  and where, following electrophysiological recording from 228 SGNs in explant cultures, only 9 neurons were unequivocally identified as type II SGNs based on their peripherin expression . The peripherin-expressing fibers that we observed in the ISP region at P1 likely represent type II fiber arbors that were noted following organotypic culture of postnatal mouse cochlear tissue .
Selective loss of type II SGNs during the first postnatal week of development
Our data indicate that most of the known loss of approximately 25% of SGNs in vivo that occurs during the first postnatal week [13, 14] is accounted for by loss of type II SGNs, and there is no significant change in type I SGN density. Previous qualitative observations indicated that at least a portion of SGN loss was accounted for by type II neurons, as identified by their peripherin expression  or location in Rosenthal's canal . Furthermore, quantification of SGN loss in the human cochlea during early development suggested that the proportion of type II neurons decreased from 25% during early embryogenesis to 12% in the infant cochlea, based on reduction of the proportion of smaller sized SGNs that were more likely to be type II SGNs .
Dependence of type I and type II SGNs on endogenous trophic support
Neuronal loss occurs extensively in the developing nervous system and is thought to provide a means of matching the size of a neuronal population with that of their postsynaptic targets through competition for limiting amounts of trophic support supplied by target tissue [3, 43, 44]. Studies in the cochlea have shown that neonatal SGNs rely on connectivity with their peripheral targets for survival in vitro , and recently Brn3c3.1 null mutants, which develop immature hair cells that die by apoptosis during the neonatal period [46, 47], concomitantly lost more than 50% of their SGNs, including the type II SGN innervation to OHCs by P7 . Our results indicate that connectivity between SGNs and the hair cells of the organ of Corti promotes the survival of both type I and type II SGNs postnatally. However, whereas trophic support supplied by the sensory epithelium was sufficient to maintain the entire population of type II SGNs, it did not support the majority of type I SGNs. This significant reduction in type I SGN density in vitro that we quantified may arise from differential sensitivity to disruption of SGN connectivity with the cochlear nucleus. A recent study showed that loss of neurons in especially the ventral cochlear nucleus (mediated by the conditional deletion of the Atoh1 gene in this region) led to the loss of approximately 30% of SGNs between P0 and P3 . Although the identity of the lost SGNs was not known, substantial losses occurred in regions of the spiral ganglion that are preferentially populated by type I SGNs. Interestingly, this loss of SGN coincides with the period of initiation of BDNF and NT-3 expression in the cochlear nucleus of gerbils and rats [50, 51] and the down-regulation of these neurotrophins in the organ of Corti [19, 21, 22], suggesting a switch of survival support from the sensory epithelium to the central target. Our data suggest that only the type I SGNs may be dependent upon the cochlear nucleus during this period. This difference in trophic dependence would help to explain the preferential loss of type II SGNs that occurs in vivo during this period. While the type I SGNs may be able to survive a reduction in neurotrophin production in the organ of Corti by switching dependence to a cochlear nucleus source, type II SGNs appear to be independent of their central targets and thus to be more dependent upon the declining peripheral neurotrophic support. Our finding that exogenous BDNF support provided significantly greater survival of type II SGNs than type I SGNs in vitro in explants at P1 corroborates the idea that the early postnatal downregulation of this neurotrophin in hair cells may give rise to the loss of type II SGNs in vivo .
Refinement of type I and type II SGN innervation of the developing organ of Corti
In addition to changes in neuronal survival, the first postnatal week is a period of significant remodeling of SGN neurites within the organ of Corti. Type I SGN neurites retract from the region of the OHCs and focus on a single IHC, while type II SGN neurites withdraw from the IHC region and substantially lengthen their projection along the OHC region [7–11]. The reduction of projections could be mediated by either the loss of neurons or remodeling of existing neurites. Our observation that only type II SGNs are lost from the neonatal SGN in vivo provides clarification, as the withdrawal of type I neurites from beneath the OHCs during this period cannot be the result of neuronal loss, but must represent the retraction of collateral neurites. In contrast, the reduction in type II dendrite presence underneath the IHCs could represent the loss of type II neurons, dendrite remodeling, or both. As the type II neurites increase their projections beneath the OHCs, they have been reported to retract collateral branches extending toward the IHCs [8, 52]. The specific marker of type II SGNs - the type III intermediate filament peripherin - may itself also bias this differential neurite outgrowth . It is also possible that some type II neurons originally projecting to the IHCs are lost. Our data cannot distinguish between these alternatives.
Whereas BDNF supported the survival of both type I and type II SGNs, this neurotrophin exerted a significant effect only on neurite outgrowth in type II SGNs. This was particularly evident at P1, corresponding to the time when type II fibers extend into the OHC region [7, 8]. The differential effect of BDNF on neuritogenesis in the two SGN populations likely reflects the interaction of downstream signaling pathways, as TrkB receptors are expressed by both type I and type II fibers . The nature of these differences is not clear. However, ATP signaling through ionotropic P2X receptors, assembled as heteromers of P2X2 and P2X3 subunits, has been shown to inhibit BDNF-dependent neurite outgrowth from SGNs . In vivo studies with transgenic mice provide compelling evidence that a primary role of BDNF is to support the type II neurons and OHC innervation throughout the cochlea as BDNF and TrkB null mice exhibit selective loss (8 to 10%) of SGNs (type II) and their fibers beneath the OHCs [23, 27, 55]. These studies, and the finding that substitution of NT-3 expression for BDNF under the BDNF promoter rescues the BDNF-dependent type II SGN innervation of OHCs, indicates that there is redundancy in TrkB and TrkC receptor signaling in the (type II) SGNs that respond to the spatiotemporal regulation of neurotrophins (intrinsically BDNF) . This is consistent with rescue of type II SGNs by exogenous BDNF in our explant model, but does not exclude complementary support from NT-3. NT-3 has been shown to provide additive support to BDNF in promoting survival of cultured gerbil and murine type II SGNs, and is synergistic with BDNF for type I SGN survival just after birth . Broader expression of BDNF, under the NT-3 promoter (knock-in) rescues the NT-3-dependent loss of SGNs in the NT-3 null mouse , again consistent with redundancy in Trk receptor signaling associated with the spatiotemporal compartmentalization of secretion of the neurotrophins by the hair cells and supporting cells. While the putative action of NT-3 in support of type I and type II SGNs was not examined in the present study, it is apparent from these transgenic models, and from our in vitro data, that BDNF signaling is central to the development of the type II innervation of OHCs.
Here we provide a comprehensive description of changes in cochlear type I and type II SGNs of mouse cochlea in vivo and in vitro during the critical period for consolidation of their innervation of IHCs and OHCs, respectively, in the first postnatal week. Our data show that the substantial neuronal loss that occurs during this period is attributable to type II SGNs alone and may also contribute to the loss of their neurites from beneath the IHCs. BDNF expression in the hair cells likely contributes a large portion of trophic support that is necessary for maintenance of this (type II) SGN sub-population and may promote the extension of the outer spiral bundle fibers along the rows of OHCs just after birth. Our model of distinguishing type I and type II SGNs will allow further investigation of the differential effect of neurotrophins and guidance molecules on these SGN sub-populations. This new knowledge of the properties of the two populations of primary auditory neurons in the cochlea will bolster research on treatments for auditory neuropathy, including research on afferent regeneration.
Materials and methods
All procedures in the study were approved by the University of Auckland Animal Ethics Committee or by the University of New South Wales Animal Care and Ethics Committee. Cochlear tissue was obtained from P1 to P21 C57/BL6 mice. P1 to P7 animals were killed by decapitation, and older animals were killed by intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbitol (90 mg/kg; Nembutal, Virbac Laboratories, East Tamaki, New Zealand).
Fixed tissue preparation
The innervation of the cochlea in vivo was determined at P1, P7 and P21 by transcardial perfusion of 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer following flushing with normal saline containing nitroprusside (0.9% NaCl; 0.5% Na2[Fe(CN)5NO], pH 7.4). Cochleae were subsequently perfused via the oval window with 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer and post-fixed at 4°C overnight. Decalcification in 8% EDTA in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) at room temperature was carried out for two (P7 to 14 tissue) or 3 days (P21 tissue). The apical-most half turn of the cochlear tissue was discarded and whole mount preparations constituted one full turn of the cochlea, from the mid-apex to mid-turn region. Bony capsule, lateral wall, Reissner's membrane and the modiolus were removed, leaving the intact spiral ganglion and organ of Corti. For mid-modiolar cross-sections, fixed cochleae were placed in 10% sucrose in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 4 hours, 30% sucrose in 0.1 M PBS for 2 days and then a 1:1 mix of 30% sucrose and Tissue-Tek OCT (Miles, Diagnostics Division, Elkhart, IN, USA) for 1 hour. They were subsequently mounted in OCT, snap frozen on dry ice and cryosections were cut at 50 μm into 0.1 M PBS. Floating sections and whole mount tissue were subsequently processed for immunofluorescence.
Organotypic and explant cultures
The survival and neurite outgrowth from neonatal (P1 to P7) SGNs were compared with and without the organ of Corti to provide trophic support, as 'organotypic' (spiral ganglion with organ of Corti intact) and 'explant' (spiral ganglion only) cultures. The cochlear otic capsule was removed and the tissue a half turn back from the apex, lacking type II SGNs, was discarded. The modiolus was cut a further full turn down to provide a mid-apical to mid-turn region. For organotypic cultures, the intact spiral ganglion, spiral limbus and organ of Corti were retained. For explant cultures, the organ of Corti and spiral limbus were removed to isolate the spiral ganglion. Spiral ganglion plus organ of Corti organotypic or SGN-only explant tissues were transferred onto glass coverslips that were pre-coated with 50 μg/ml poly-D-lysine (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) overnight at 4°C. These were placed in single wells of a 24-well plate, each of which contained 200 μl neuron maintenance medium (DMEM (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), 10 μl/ml N2 supplement (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 25 mM Hepes (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA), 300 units/ml penicillin (Sigma-Aldrich), 6 mg/ml glucose (Sigma-Aldrich)). Medium was replaced after the first 24 hours. In explant experiments, half of the explants also contained 100 ng/ml of the neurotrophin BDNF (Promokine, Heidelberg, Germany), which was added to the cell culture medium just prior to plating. Explants were cultured at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 for 48 hours. Tissue was then fixed for 20 minutes with 4% paraformaldehyde, washed with PBS and processed for immunofluorescence.
Whole mounts, cryosections and cultured tissue were incubated in blocking/permeablizing solution (10% normal goat serum and 2.5% Triton X-100 in PBS) for 2 to 3 hours at room temperature and then overnight at room temperature in primary antibody solution: β-tubulin antisera (1:500 dilution) and peripherin antisera (1:1,000 dilution) with 5% normal goat serum and 0.25% Triton X-100 in 0.1 M PBS. The following day, sections were washed in PBS, then incubated for 2 hours at room temperature in secondary antibody solution (Alexa-488 conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (1:500); Alexa-594 conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:500); Alexa-647 conjugated goat anti-rabbit (1:200); all from Invitrogen) with 5% normal goat serum and 0.25% Triton X-100 in 0.1 M PBS. Cochlear tissue was washed with PBS and in some experiments hair cells were stained with 1:150 rhodamine-phalloidin (Invitrogen) in PBS for 15 minutes at room temperature. Following further washing with PBS, tissue was mounted on glass slides in Vectastain (Vector Laboratories, Burlingane, CA, USA) and stored at 4°C.
Background data on primary antibodies
A mouse monoclonal antibody against class III β-tubulin (TUJ1 clone, Covance, Emeryville, CA, USA) was used to label all SGNs and the expression we observed reflected that previously described for rodent cochlear tissue in vivo and in vitro [29, 31]. Peripherin polyclonal rabbit antiserum (PII/SE411; a gift from Dr Annie Wolff, Division de Biochimie, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France) was used to distinguish the type II SGNs. This antibody specifically targets a peptide corresponding to residues 432 to 461 of rat peripherin and our immunolabeling of in vivo peripherin expression by the type II SGNs matched that described by Huang et al. , where the same peripherin antiserum was used. Our peripherin immunoreactivity was also equivalent to that previously described in cultured mouse cochlear tissue . We have also previously validated the specificity of the peripherin antibody using peripherin null mice .
Image acquisition and quantitative analysis
Images were acquired by confocal microscopy (Olympus FV1000, Japan and Zeiss LSM710, Germany), saved as TIFF files and processed using Adobe Photoshop CS2 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA) and Image J (NIH, USA) software. Levels were adjusted to remove background fluorescence, whilst ensuring that no neurite detail was lost. Image J was used for all quantitative analysis.
In vivo type I and type II SGN density was quantified from mid-modiolar cross-sections of cochleae from P1, P7 and P21 mice. The apex, apical, middle and basal turn spiral ganglia in 50 μm cross-sections were imaged using confocal microscopy with 5 μm between each optical section. The volume of each ganglion was calculated by measuring the area of the spiral ganglion in each optical section, converting this to a volume by multiplying by 5 μm and summing all of the volumes within an image stack. β-Tubulin and peripherin provided good perinuclear immunolabeling of neurons and thus permitted distinction of the nuclei in each cell. Cells were counted in an optical section where the area of the nucleus was greatest relative to the soma. For example, analysis of nucleus area:soma area in consecutive optical sections revealed that 5 μm z steps were sufficient to ensure that in all cases the large round nucleus (mean relative nucleus area at maximum size = 51%) could only appear in a single image; sections above or below that showed only cytoplasm, or a small nucleus that made up less than 34% of the cell area (n = 50); thus, we were confident we were not counting a cell more than once. Neuron counts from each optical section were summed for each image stack to give a neuron count for each ganglion. Neuron density (per 100 μm3) was subsequently calculated. Our volumetric approach encompassed variation in SGN somata size and increases in the size of the spiral ganglion with location and age, previously observed in the gerbil cochlea between P0 and P21 . The mean neuron densities of all SGNs, and separately type I SGNs and type II SGNs, were determined for each cochlea and mean neuron density for each age was subsequently calculated. Neuron densities in whole mounts (the in vivo state) and following organotypic and explant culture of the P1 and P7 cochleae were determined in the same manner.
To investigate neurite outgrowth from control and BDNF-treated P1 and P7 explants, single plane, confocal images of explants were captured using a 5× or 10× objective. NeuronJ (an ImageJ plugin) was used to trace and measure neurite lengths. SigmaPlot 11 (Systat Software Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all graphing and statistical analyses. The normal distribution of data was verified and statistical comparisons were made using one-way ANOVA's with post hoc Holm-Sidak tests and Students two-tailed, unpaired t-tests.
brain-derived neurotrophic factor
inner hair cell
inner spiral plexus
outer hair cell
spiral ganglion neuron.
We thank Kwang Pak and Eduardo Chavez, University of California San Diego, Department of Surgery/Otolaryngology, for help with the culture of SGN explants and Lin-Chien Huang, University of Auckland, Centre for Brain Research, for many useful discussions regarding this work. This research was supported by the Marsden Fund (Royal Society of New Zealand) - MB and GH; the Australian Research Council - GH; Top Achiever Doctoral Scholarship (Tertiary Education Commission) - MB; University of Auckland Doctoral Scholarship - MB; and the VA Research Service - AFR.
- Kano M, Hashimoto K: Synapse elimination in the central nervous system. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2009, 19: 154-161. 10.1016/j.conb.2009.05.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luo L, O'Leary DD: Axon retraction and degeneration in development and disease. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005, 28: 127-156. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135632.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buss RR, Sun W, Oppenheim RW: Adaptive roles of programmed cell death during nervous system development. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006, 29: 1-35. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112800.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clarke PG, Posada A, Primi MP, Castagne V: Neuronal death in the central nervous system during development. Biomed Pharmacother. 1998, 52: 356-362. 10.1016/S0753-3322(99)80002-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jagger DJ, Housley GD: Membrane properties of type II spiral ganglion neurones identified in a neonatal rat cochlear slice. J Physiol. 2003, 552: 525-533. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2003.00525.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ashmore J, Avan P, Brownell WE, Dallos P, Dierkes K, Fettiplace R, Grosh K, Hackney CM, Hudspeth AJ, Julicher F, Lindner B, Martin P, Meaud J, Petit C, Sacchi JR, Canlon B: The remarkable cochlear amplifier. Hear Res. 2010, 266: 1-17. 10.1016/j.heares.2010.05.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Echteler SM: Developmental segregation in the afferent projections to mammalian auditory hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89: 6324-6327. 10.1073/pnas.89.14.6324.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang LC, Thorne PR, Housley GD, Montgomery JM: Spatiotemporal definition of neurite outgrowth, refinement and retraction in the developing mouse cochlea. Development. 2007, 134: 2925-2933. 10.1242/dev.001925.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pujol R: Development of sensory and neural structures in the mammalian cochlea. Development of the Auditory System. Edited by: Rubel EW. 1998, New York: Springer, 146-191.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rubel EW, Fritzsch B: Auditory system development: primary auditory neurons and their targets. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2002, 25: 51-101. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142849.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simmons DD: A transient afferent innervation of outer hair cells in the postnatal cochlea. Neuroreport. 1994, 5: 1309-1312.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fritzsch B, Dillard M, Lavado A, Harvey NL, Jahan I: Canal cristae growth and fiber extension to the outer hair cells of the mouse ear require Prox1 activity. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e9377-10.1371/journal.pone.0009377.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rueda J, de la Sen C, Juiz JM, Merchan JA: Neuronal loss in the spiral ganglion of young rats. Acta Otolaryngol. 1987, 104: 417-421. 10.3109/00016488709128269.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Echteler SM, Nofsinger YC: Development of ganglion cell topography in the postnatal cochlea. J Comp Neurol. 2000, 425: 436-446. 10.1002/1096-9861(20000925)425:3<436::AID-CNE8>3.0.CO;2-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Catsicas S, Thanos S, Clarke PG: Major role for neuronal death during brain development: refinement of topographical connections. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987, 84: 8165-8168. 10.1073/pnas.84.22.8165.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fritzsch B: Development of inner ear afferent connections: forming primary neurons and connecting them to the developing sensory epithelia. Brain Res Bull. 2003, 60: 423-433. 10.1016/S0361-9230(03)00048-0.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fritzsch B, Silos-Santiago I, Bianchi LM, Farinas I: The role of neurotrophic factors in regulating the development of inner ear innervation. Trends Neurosci. 1997, 20: 159-164. 10.1016/S0166-2236(96)01007-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fritzsch B, Tessarollo L, Coppola E, Reichardt LF: Neurotrophins in the ear: their roles in sensory neuron survival and fiber guidance. Prog Brain Res. 2004, 146: 265-278.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sugawara M, Murtie JC, Stankovic KM, Liberman MC, Corfas G: Dynamic patterns of neurotrophin 3 expression in the postnatal mouse inner ear. J Comp Neurol. 2007, 501: 30-37. 10.1002/cne.21227.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Farinas I, Jones KR, Tessarollo L, Vigers AJ, Huang E, Kirstein M, de Caprona DC, Coppola V, Backus C, Reichardt LF, Fritzsch B: Spatial shaping of cochlear innervation by temporally regulated neurotrophin expression. J Neurosci. 2001, 21: 6170-6180.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wheeler EF, Bothwell M, Schecterson LC, von Bartheld CS: Expression of BDNF and NT-3 mRNA in hair cells of the organ of Corti: quantitative analysis in developing rats. Hear Res. 1994, 73: 46-56. 10.1016/0378-5955(94)90281-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wiechers B, Gestwa G, Mack A, Carroll P, Zenner HP, Knipper M: A changing pattern of brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression correlates with the rearrangement of fibers during cochlear development of rats and mice. J Neurosci. 1999, 19: 3033-3042.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ernfors P, Van De Water T, Loring J, Jaenisch R: Complementary roles of BDNF and NT-3 in vestibular and auditory development. Neuron. 1995, 14: 1153-1164. 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90263-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liebl DJ, Tessarollo L, Palko ME, Parada LF: Absence of sensory neurons before target innervation in brain-derived neurotrophic factor-, neurotrophin 3-, and TrkC-deficient embryonic mice. J Neurosci. 1997, 17: 9113-9121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schimmang T, Alvarez-Bolado G, Minichiello L, Vazquez E, Giraldez F, Klein R, Represa J: Survival of inner ear sensory neurons in trk mutant mice. Mech Dev. 1997, 64: 77-85. 10.1016/S0925-4773(97)00047-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coppola V, Kucera J, Palko ME, Martinez-De Velasco J, Lyons WE, Fritzsch B, Tessarollo L: Dissection of NT3 functions in vivo by gene replacement strategy. Development. 2001, 128: 4315-4327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Agerman K, Hjerling-Leffler J, Blanchard MP, Scarfone E, Canlon B, Nosrat C, Ernfors P: BDNF gene replacement reveals multiple mechanisms for establishing neurotrophin specificity during sensory nervous system development. Development. 2003, 130: 1479-1491. 10.1242/dev.00378.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barclay M, Julien JP, Ryan AF, Housley GD: Type III intermediate filament peripherin inhibits neuritogenesis in type II spiral ganglion neurons in vitro. Neurosci Lett. 2010, 478: 51-55. 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.01.063.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Flores-Otero J, Xue HZ, Davis RL: Reciprocal regulation of presynaptic and postsynaptic proteins in bipolar spiral ganglion neurons by neurotrophins. J Neurosci. 2007, 27: 14023-14034. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3219-07.2007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lallemend F, Lefebvre PP, Hans G, Rigo JM, Van de Water TR, Moonen G, Malgrange B: Substance P protects spiral ganglion neurons from apoptosis via PKC-Ca2+-MAPK/ERK pathways. J Neurochem. 2003, 87: 508-521. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.02014.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lallemend F, Vandenbosch R, Hadjab S, Bodson M, Breuskin I, Moonen G, Lefebvre PP, Malgrange B: New insights into peripherin expression in cochlear neurons. Neuroscience. 2007, 150: 212-222. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.08.032.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reid MA, Flores-Otero J, Davis RL: Firing patterns of type II spiral ganglion neurons in vitro. J Neurosci. 2004, 24: 733-742. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3923-03.2004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhou Z, Liu Q, Davis RL: Complex regulation of spiral ganglion neuron firing patterns by neurotrophin-3. J Neurosci. 2005, 25: 7558-7566. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1735-05.2005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Flores-Otero J, Davis RL: Synaptic proteins are tonotopically graded in postnatal and adult type I and type II spiral ganglion neurons. J Comp Neurol. 2011, 519: 1455-1475. 10.1002/cne.22576.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sherrard RM, Bower AJ: Role of afferents in the development and cell survival of the vertebrate nervous system. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1998, 25: 487-495. 10.1111/j.1440-1681.1998.tb02241.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hafidi A, Despres G, Romand R: Ontogenesis of type II spiral ganglion neurons during development: peripherin immunohistochemistry. Int J Dev Neurosci. 1993, 11: 507-512. 10.1016/0736-5748(93)90024-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keithley EM, Feldman ML: Spiral ganglion cell counts in an age-graded series of rat cochleas. J Comp Neurol. 1979, 188: 429-442. 10.1002/cne.901880306.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Liu H, Shen Y, Wang Z, Li H: Peripherin as a marker for degeneration of spiral ganglion neurons after aminoglycoside ototoxicity. Acta Otolaryngol. 2006, 126: 1128-1133. 10.1080/00016480600672584.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mou K, Adamson CL, Davis RL: Time-dependence and cell-type specificity of synergistic neurotrophin actions on spiral ganglion neurons. J Comp Neurol. 1998, 402: 129-139. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19981207)402:1<129::AID-CNE9>3.0.CO;2-A.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sobkowicz H: The development of innervation in the organ of Corti. Development of Auditory and Vestibular Systems. Edited by: Romand MR. 1992, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 2: 59-100.Google Scholar
- Echteler SM, Magardino T, Rontal M: Spatiotemporal patterns of neuronal programmed cell death during postnatal development of the gerbil cochlea. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 2005, 157: 192-200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chiong CM, Burgess BJ, Nadol JB: Postnatal maturation of human spiral ganglion cells: light and electron microscopic observations. Hear Res. 1993, 67: 211-219. 10.1016/0378-5955(93)90249-Z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Farinas I: Neurotrophin actions during the development of the peripheral nervous system. Microsc Res Tech. 1999, 45: 233-242. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19990515/01)45:4/5<233::AID-JEMT7>3.0.CO;2-Y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oppenheim RW: Cell death during development of the nervous system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1991, 14: 453-501. 10.1146/annurev.ne.14.030191.002321.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lefebvre PP, Weber T, Rigo JM, Staecker H, Moonen G, Van De Water TR: Peripheral and central target-derived trophic factor(s) effects on auditory neurons. Hear Res. 1992, 58: 185-192. 10.1016/0378-5955(92)90127-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Erkman L, McEvilly RJ: Role of transcription factors Brn-3.1 and Brn-3.2 in auditory and visual system development. Nature. 1996, 381: 603-10.1038/381603a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xiang M, Gao WQ, Hasson T, Shin JJ: Requirement for Brn-3c in maturation and survival, but not in fate determination of inner ear hair cells. Development. 1998, 125: 3935-3946.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xiang M, Maklad A, Pirvola U, Fritzsch B: Brn3c null mutant mice show long-term, incomplete retention of some afferent inner ear innervation. BMC Neurosci. 2003, 4: 2-10.1186/1471-2202-4-2.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maricich SM, Xia A, Mathes EL, Wang VY, Oghalai JS, Fritzsch B, Zoghbi HY: Atoh1-lineal neurons are required for hearing and for the survival of neurons in the spiral ganglion and brainstem accessory auditory nuclei. J Neurosci. 2009, 29: 11123-11133. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2232-09.2009.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hafidi A: Distribution of BDNF, NT-3 and NT-4 in the developing auditory brainstem. Int J Dev Neurosci. 1999, 17: 285-294. 10.1016/S0736-5748(99)00043-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tierney TS, T PD, Xia G, Moore DR: Development of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin-3 immunoreactivity in the lower auditory brainstem of the postnatal gerbil. Eur J Neurosci. 2001, 14: 785-793. 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01690.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perkins RE, Morest DK: A study of cochlear innervation patterns in cats and rats with the Golgi method and Nomarkski Optics. J Comp Neurol. 1975, 163: 129-158. 10.1002/cne.901630202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gestwa G, Wiechers B, Zimmermann U, Praetorius M, Rohbock K, Kopschall I, Zenner HP, Knipper M: Differential expression of trkB.T1 and trkB.T2, truncated trkC, and p75(NGFR) in the cochlea prior to hearing function. J Comp Neurol. 1999, 414: 33-49. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19991108)414:1<33::AID-CNE3>3.0.CO;2-M.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Greenwood D, Jagger DJ, Huang LC, Hoya N, Thorne PR, Wildman SS, King BF, Pak K, Ryan AF, Housley GD: P2X receptor signaling inhibits BDNF-mediated spiral ganglion neuron development in the neonatal rat cochlea. Development. 2007, 134: 1407-1417. 10.1242/dev.002279.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schimmang T, Minichiello L, Vazquez E, San Jose I, Giraldez F, Klein R, Represa J: Developing inner ear sensory neurons require TrkB and TrkC receptors for innervation of their peripheral targets. Development. 1995, 121: 3381-3391.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barclay M, Noakes PG, Ryan AF, Julien JP, Housley GD: Neuronal expression of peripherin, a type III intermediate filament protein, in the mouse hindbrain. Histochem Cell Biol. 2007, 128: 541-550. 10.1007/s00418-007-0340-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.