Dendrites differ from axons in patterns of microtubule stability and polymerization during development
© Kollins et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 03 February 2009
Accepted: 14 July 2009
Published: 14 July 2009
Dendrites differ from axons in patterns of growth and development, as well as in morphology. Given that microtubules are key structural elements in cells, we assessed patterns of microtubule stability and polymerization during hippocampal neuron development in vitro to determine if these aspects of microtubule organization could distinguish axons from dendrites.
Quantitative ratiometric immunocytochemistry identified significant differences in microtubule stability between axons and dendrites. Most notably, regardless of developmental stage, there were high levels of dynamic microtubules throughout the dendritic arbor, whereas dynamic microtubules were predominantly concentrated in the distal end of axons. Analysis of microtubule polymerization using green fluorescent protein-tagged EB1 showed both developmental and regional differences in microtubule polymerization between axons and dendrites. Early in development (for example, 1 to 2 days in vitro), polymerization events were distributed equally in both the anterograde and retrograde directions throughout the length of both axons and dendrites. As development progressed, however, polymerization became biased, with a greater number of polymerization events in distal than in proximal and middle regions. While polymerization occurred almost exclusively in the anterograde direction for axons, both anterograde and retrograde polymerization was observed in dendrites. This is in agreement with predicted differences in microtubule polarity within these compartments, although fewer retrograde events were observed in dendrites than expected.
Both immunocytochemical and live imaging analyses showed that newly formed microtubules predominated at the distal end of axons and dendrites, suggesting a common mechanism that incorporates increased microtubule polymerization at growing process tips. Dendrites had more immature, dynamic microtubules throughout the entire arbor than did axons, however. Identifying these differences in microtubule stability and polymerization is a necessary first step toward understanding how they are developmentally regulated, and may reveal novel mechanisms underlying neuron maturation and dendritic plasticity that extend beyond the initial specification of polarity.
A fundamental problem in cell biology is how morphologically and functionally distinct compartments are assembled and maintained in polarized cells. For hippocampal neurons developing in vitro, polarization occurs as structurally equivalent immature minor processes differentiate into mature axonal and dendritic arbors [1, 2]. During this developmental progression, dendrites diverge from axons through a stereotypic sequence of morphogenesis, suggesting that at some level the cytoskeleton is being organized differently . In fact, evidence suggests that local control of microtubule polymerization [4, 5] and stability  both play a role in the initial specification of the axon and in minor process outgrowth [7, 8]. Thus, it may be that differences in local regulation of microtubule polymerization or stability also underlie the faster rate of growth observed in axons [2, 9, 10], as well as contribute to the delayed formation and maturation of the dendritic arbor [3, 11, 12].
Previous work has shown that net axon growth involves both dynein motor-driven transport of short microtubules [13, 14] and the formation of microtubule polymers within the axonal growth cone [5, 15–17]. Correspondingly, molecular markers for newly assembled microtubules are concentrated at growing ends, while markers for more mature microtubules are found in the stable proximal and middle regions of axons [18–21]. Few studies have tested whether dendritic growth depends on tubulin subunit addition to the same extent, but overexpression of cypin, a protein that promotes microtubule polymerization, has been shown to increase the size of the dendritic arbor [22, 23].
One characteristic difference that arises during maturation of the axon and dendrites is their intrinsic microtubule polarity. Previous electron microscopic analysis showed that axons of mature vertebrate neurons contained microtubules that were oriented exclusively with plus-ends projecting away from the soma, whereas the dendrites contained a combination of microtubules with mixed polarity . Current imaging techniques allow microtubule polymerization to be examined directly in living cells, and can be used to determine how well this static view represents the dynamic nature of the microtubule network. Microtubule binding proteins that associate specifically with the distal plus-ends of actively polymerizing microtubules (called +TIPS), when tagged with green fluorescent protein (GFP), produce fluorescent 'comets' that track in the direction of polymerization [25, 26]. Several in vitro studies have characterized GFP-+TIP dynamics, confirming that real-time localization of these proteins directly reflects the polarity of microtubule assembly in a variety of neuronal types [13, 27–31]. One such protein, EB1, binds microtubules with high affinity and has been used in live imaging studies to study patterns of polymerization [32–35]. Thus, these fluorescent tools have the potential to reveal 'hot regions' of microtubule polymerization associated with active growth, as well as the orientation of microtubule polymerization, with the caveat that expression of a fusion protein can interfere with the function of the native protein.
The current study takes advantage of fluorescent imaging approaches to determine whether the spatial and temporal patterns of microtubule stability and polymerization differ between developing axons and dendrites of cultured hippocampal neurons. In this well-characterized model system, morphological stages of development can be observed readily . In these cells, axons form first and grow rapidly. After the initial specification of the axon, development proceeds with an extended period of dendritic growth and maturation, during which dendrites become tapered, the arbor becomes highly branched, and postsynaptic specializations (for example, dendritic spines), appear. Quantitative immunofluorescence was used to compare the distribution of tyrosinated (Tyr) and acetylated (Ac) tubulin, post-translational modifications that reflect newly assembled (that is, dynamic) and mature stable microtubules, respectively [36, 37]. Local patterns of microtubule polymerization were determined by measuring the distribution and directionality of fluorescent comets in living neurons expressing GFP-tagged EB1. Our analyses showed that axons and dendrites develop significant differences in both regional stability and ongoing polymerization of microtubules, each following distinct time courses. Dendrites could be distinguished from axons in patterns of microtubule stability within the first 2 days in vitro (DIV), whereas differences in patterns of polymerization arose later. Understanding how these differences are developmentally regulated may reveal novel mechanisms underlying neuron maturation and dendritic plasticity that extend beyond the initial specification of polarity.
Materials and methods
Primary neuron cultures were prepared from hippocampi of embryonic day 18 Sprague-Dawley rats (Taconic, Rensselaer, NY, USA) as previously described  except where noted below. Dissociated neurons were plated onto poly-L-lysine coated glass coverslips at approximately 15,000 cells/cm2 for transfection experiments and at lower densities of 2,000 to 4,000 cells/cm2 for immunocytochemistry studies, to facilitate visualization of separate neuronal processes, and maintained in Neurobasal medium (Gibco, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with either B27 (Gibco, Invitrogen) or N2 supplements  and Glutamax (Gibco, Invitrogen). At 2 days post-plating, 5 μM cytosine β-D-arabinofuranoside (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to the co-cultures to prevent further glial cell division.
PC12 rat pheochromocytoma cells (ATCC number: CRL-1721) were grown and treated with nerve growth factor (50 ng/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) to induce a neuron-like phenotype, as described previously [40, 41]. After 7 to 10 days, differentiated PC12 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 1% horse serum (HS) and 50 ng/ml nerve growth factor, which was refreshed by exchanging one-third of the plating volume every other day during the culture period.
Antibodies and immunocytochemistry
To study the distribution of newly assembled and stable microtubules, monomeric tubulin was extracted by placing neuronal cultures in microtubule stabilizing buffer (80 mM PIPES pH 6.8, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM EGTA with 0.5% Triton X-100) for 30 s followed immediately by fixation in -20°C methanol for 3 to 5 minutes, and rehydration in 0.15 M Tris HCl, 0.15 M NaCl, and 0.1% Triton X-100. To ensure that there were no artifacts associated with methanol fixation, additional neurons were extracted by briefly rinsing in the microtubule stabilizing buffer PHEM (60 mM PIPES, 25 mM HEPES, 10 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2, pH 6.9), followed by 0.5% Triton X-100 and 10 μm taxol in PHEM followed by fixation in 4% formaldehyde, 4% sucrose in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) . Similar results were observed between these two extraction methods. Neurons were double-immunostained as described previously  using anti-acetylated tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich, clone 6–11B-1 mouse purified immunoglobulin, 1:1,000) and anti-tyrosinated tubulin (Chemicon, Temecula, CA, USA, clone YL1/2 rat monoclonal antibodies, 1:500). Total tubulin was assessed using anti-mouse alpha tubulin (DM1A, Sigma-Aldrich, 1:1,000), or anti-rabbit neuron-specific beta III tubulin (Covance Research Products, Princeton, NJ, USA). Secondary antibodies used were: Alexafluor goat anti-rabbit 546 (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA; 1:500); FITC goat anti-rat (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA; 1:500); and Alexafluor goat anti-mouse 488 (Molecular Probes; 1:400). All fixed and immunostained coverslips were rinsed, and mounted with Elvanol anti-fade medium (133.5 mM Tris HCl, 9.5 mM poly-vinyl alcohol, 45 mM Dabco, 3.6 mM glycerol).
GFP-fusion constructs and transient transfection
The GFP-tagged EB1 plasmid (pEGFP-N1 vector, Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA) was obtained from Lynn Cassimeris, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA . Cells were transfected with 1.6 to 2 μg/ml purified DNA per 6-cm dish, in glial-conditioned medium. DOTAP (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA) was used to transfect EB1-GFP into hippocampal neurons immediately after their isolation, and expression was examined between 1 and 17 DIV. In addition, Effectene (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and Lipofectamine 2000 (Gibco, Invitrogen) were used for transfection of hippocampal neurons performed between 3 and 10 DIV, and for PC12 cells, with EB1-GFP expression examined 24 to 48 h thereafter. For all lipid-mediated transfections, after a 4-h incubation in the transfection mixture at 37°C, neuronal coverslips were transferred to glial-feeder co-culture dishes and maintained in Neurobasal medium supplemented with 1 mM kynurenic acid (Sigma-Aldrich) to reduce excitotoxicity, and 2 mM sodium butyrate (Sigma-Aldrich) to enhance expression of cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter-driven genes.
Fluorescence microscopy and live cell imaging
Images of immunostained neurons were acquired using a Leica DM-RA2 epifluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems, Bannockburn, IL, USA) with a high resolution motorized stage (ProScan, Prior Scientific, Rockland, MA, USA) coupled to a cooled CCD camera (CoolSnap fx 20 MHz Camera, Photometrics, Tucson, AZ, USA), using identical camera settings for fluorescent images (500 ms exposure). Cells were selected for acquisition using a forced sampling scheme. Briefly, the stage was moved at fixed intervals and digital images of the cells nearest the center of the field were acquired with Fluotar 20× and 40× objectives using MetaMorph software (MDS Analytical Technologies, Downingtown, PA, USA).
For live imaging of hippocampal neurons and PC12 cells, plated coverslips were sealed into a heated imaging chamber (Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT, USA) in phenol red-free minimal essential medium (MEM, Gibco, Invitrogen) supplemented with 30 μM glucose, 1 mM pyruvate, 500 μM kynurenic acid, and the antioxidants N-acetyl-cysteine (60 μM; Sigma-Aldrich), Trolox (20 μM; Sigma-Aldrich)) and Oxyrase (1:100; Oxyrase, Inc., Mansfield, OH, USA) to minimize phototoxicity and bleaching, and maintained at 34.5 to 36°C throughout the duration of the recording. Images were acquired with either a Fluotar 40× or Plan Apo 63×/1.32 NA objective using a Leica DM-RXA microscope (Leica Microsystems) coupled to a Princeton Instruments Micromax 5 Mhz CCD camera (Roper Scientific, Trenton, NJ, USA) or with a Leica DM-RA2 microscope with a Photometrics CoolSNAP fx 20 MHz camera. Time series stacks of images were acquired with MetaMorph software using either the 'stream acquire' (capturing continuous 600 ms exposures for durations of 30 to 60 s) or 'time series' function (capturing 750 ms or 1 s exposures for durations of 30 s to 2 minutes). During recording, a single plane of focus was maintained, which was sufficient to visualize EB1-GFP comets throughout the thickness of axons and most dendrites.
Image processing and data analysis
Ratio imaging of immunostained neurons was performed using MetaMorph software. First, to control for nonuniformity in the image field, shading corrections and background subtraction were applied, using an image from a blank slide acquired under the same acquisition parameters. Next, to compare fluorescent intensity of the mid-shaft with the distal tip of dendrites, each dendrite was traced from cell body to tip to determine its length. A 5-μm segment from the midpoint, and a 5-μm segment from within the last 10 microns of the tip were selected (purposefully excluding the growth cone), and the 'line scan' function was used to obtain the mean pixel intensity for each of these regions for each antibody. The ratio of mid-shaft to distal region for both acetylated and tyrosinated forms of tubulin was calculated by dividing the value obtained at the mid-shaft region by the value obtained at the distal region. The same method was used to quantify immunofluorescence in axons.
Tyrosinated microtubules are abundant in distal ends of axons and tips of developing dendrites
Within axons, Tyr-tubulin was enriched in growth cones (for example, note strong staining in axonal growth cones in Figure 2A; arrow in corresponding merged image, Figure 2C) as well as in the distal region of the axon (Figure 2D, F). Ac-tubulin was proportionally higher within the proximal and middle segments of the axon (Figure 2E, H; red in the corresponding merged images, Figure 2F, I). Similar patterns have been reported for axons of sympathetic neurons, suggesting common spatial regulation of microtubule stability among developing neuronal cell types [18–21].
During the first week in culture, dendritic growth cones stained intensely for Tyr-tubulin (Figure 2, arrowheads), similar to the distal Tyr-tubulin enrichment observed in axons. By 19 DIV, growth cones on dendrites could no longer be detected. At this late stage of development, growth cones could be present, though not apparent with immunostaining of the crowded neuronal field; alternatively, a loss of dendritic growth cones could reflect a change in the maturational state of the arbor.
Differential distribution of dynamic microtubules in shafts of dendrites and axons
Regardless of developmental time in culture, the entire dendritic arbor exhibited pronounced immunofluorescence for Tyr-tubulin (Figure 2A, D, G, J) as well as Ac-tubulin (Figure 2B, E, H, K), whereas Tyr-tubulin was clearly less abundant in the proximal and middle regions of axons. This suggested that the distribution of acetylated and tyrosinated microtubules along the dendrite shaft was more closely parallel than reciprocally proportional. To test this, we determined the ratio of immunofluorescence intensity of dynamic and stable microtubules at the midpoint and distal ends of the axon and dendrites of individual cells, and then compared the magnitude of difference (midshaft-to-distal). To control for potential variability in staining intensity between cells, this analysis was limited to cells at 2 DIV, where both the entire axon and dendritic field were contained within a single digital micrograph. With this comparison, the mean ratio of Ac-tubulin to Tyr-tubulin was 40% lower in dendrites than in axons (mean value of ratio Ac:Tyr ± standard error: dendrites, 4.68 ± 0.3; axons, 7.23 ± 1.79). Thus, there was proportionally more dynamic tubulin within dendrite shafts than within axons at this developmental time-point.
Microtubule polymerization is not restricted to growing ends of axons and dendrites
Additional file 2: Movement of EB-1 comets in a dendrite at 1 DIV. Segment of a dendrite (shown in Figure 6a') at 1 DIV showing most EB-1 comets traveling in the anterograde direction (toward the right), although retrograde events (toward the left) are clearly apparent as well. (MOV 417 KB)
Microtubule polymerization becomes biased toward distal regions with neuronal development
At 1 to 2 DIV, comets were distributed equally across the proximal-middle and distal regions of both axons and dendrites. In more mature neurons (7 to 17 DIV), however, more polymerization events per unit length were observed in the distal regions of both axons and dendrites. These data suggest that with maturation, overall microtubule polymerization declines within the established portion of both the axonal and dendritic shafts, whereas distal regions of active growth maintain higher levels of polymerization, as predicted.
The orientation of polymerizing microtubules changes with development
During the first 2 days in culture there was no difference in the overall directionality of microtubule polymerization between immature axons and dendrites of EB1-expressing polarized neurons, with most polymerization events occurring anterogradely. Approximately 11% of all comets traveled in the retrograde direction, a somewhat larger percentage than would have been predicted based on electron microscopy analyses of microtubule orientation (3 to 6%) . As neurons matured, axons exhibited polymerization events that became nearly uniformly oriented in the anterograde direction, with fewer than 2% of the comets traveling in the retrograde direction (Figure 8C). Within dendrites, the proportion of retrograde events increased with time in culture (Figure 8F) as expected, but only reached 24% at the most advanced time-points measured (7 to 17 DIV) rather than the 50% expected. Taken together, these findings indicate that the directionality of microtubule polymerization mirrors the predicted distribution of anterogradely oriented microtubules in mature axons closely. Even with an increasing proportion of retrograde polymerization events, however, dendrites may have separate mechanisms controlling the gradual attainment of the characteristic mixed microtubule polarity and the distribution of microtubule polymerization.
Analysis of rate and comparison with a neuron-like cell line, PC12 cells
Microtubule polymerization rates in developing neurons and PC12 cells
Mean Velocity (μm/sec ± SE)
Mean Velocity (μm/sec ± SE)
0.23 ± 0.02 (142)
0.25 ± 0.02 (114)
0.29 ± 0.05 (22)
0.20 ± 0.05 (9)
0.26 ± 0.01 (214)
0.36 ± 0.02 (199)
0.43 ± 0.20 (5)
0.27 ± 0.03 (44)
> 7 DIV
0.33 ± 0.02 (86)
0.22 ± 0.03 (68)
0.18 ± 0.03 (21)
0.18 ± 0.003 (382)
0.17 ± 0.01 (86)
For comparison with another cell type that extends processes, we measured the rate and orientation of polymerization events in PC12 cells after they had been induced to take on a neuron-like phenotype. Although these cells extend processes, they do not differentiate into axons or dendrites, but instead have features characteristic of each. Similar to neurons, microtubule polymerization in PC12 cells was evident throughout the length of the neurites (Additional file 9). Quantification of the number of EB1-GFP comets showed that while 82% of the polymerization events occurred in the anterograde direction, 18% were oriented in the retrograde direction (Table 1), suggesting similarity to mature dendrites rather than to axons in this measure.
Our findings suggest that even before the dendrites of cultured hippocampal neurons began to show signs of maturation (2 DIV), they contained a higher proportion of dynamic Tyr-tubulin throughout their arbor than did axons, and these high levels of Tyr-tubulin were maintained for several weeks. From these data, it appears that differential control over stability not only contributes to axon formation during the initiation of neuron polarity , but it also continues to distinguish dendrites from axons into maturity as well. The directionality of microtubule polymerization within axons and dendrites diverged later in development (3 to 4 DIV), with an increased incidence of retrogradely oriented polymerization that is closely aligned with the time-course of dendrite morphogenesis. This lag supports the hypothesis that changes in the orientation of microtubule polarity do not contribute to the initial specification of polarity, but may be important for later stages of dendritic maturation. Further strengthening this argument, interactions between retrogradely oriented microtubules and motor proteins, particularly dynein, have recently been shown to play a significant role in the transport and localization of dendritic proteins and organelles in mammalian models , as well as dendritic growth and branching in Drosophila neurons .
Post-translational modifications of microtubules and the development of neuronal polarity
High levels of dynamic microtubules were present throughout the shaft of dendrites during development, as well as in mature neurons. This clearly contrasted with the distribution of microtubules in axons, where microtubules in the shafts were predominantly stable, whereas the microtubules in the distal ends were more dynamic, similar to axons of peripheral neurons [18–21]. These results fit well with previous reports of differential vulnerability to microtubule depolymerizing drugs between axons and dendrites of sympathetic neurons [20, 47]; microtubules in the proximal and middle shaft of axons showed resistance to nocodozole treatment, whereas microtubules in dendrites were more vulnerable. More recent evidence suggests that interfering with post-translational modifications (for example, acetylation and detyrosination ) that are associated with microtubule stability can have significant effects on branching in axons  and cause aberrant outgrowth , potentially impacting the association of some +TIPs with microtubule ends . Post-translational modifications of tubulin also contribute to the regulation of differential subcellular transport, in particular by altering the affinity of some transport vesicles and motors for particular microtubules [51, 52]. Thus, local asymmetric increases in microtubule acetylation or detyrosination could bias kinesin-mediated transport to particular neurites, generating positive feedback signaling to allow for continued outgrowth and differentiation.
Subcellular changes in microtubule stability or transport could help to explain the different patterns of outgrowth that have been observed in different domains of cultured hippocampal neurons. While both axons and dendrites elongate and add collateral branches along their arbor, they can be distinguished by the rates of growth and patterns of motility once the axon becomes specified [9, 10]. The axon extends rapidly, growing as much as several hundred microns per day, whereas the net growth rate of dendrites is very slow. Individual dendritic branches increase in length by about 10 μm/day and show frequent bouts of retraction as well as extension. A higher proportion of immature, and thus less stable, tubulin polymers within the shaft could contribute to the frequent retractions, and slow net growth of dendrites. Likewise, biased delivery of kinesin-associated vesicles to the more acetylated microtubules of the axon could also facilitate its rapid growth.
Considered together, the present data and earlier findings demonstrate that from the earliest specification of polarity and continuing into maturity, the axonal shaft is composed of relatively stable microtubules, whereas the dendritic arbor maintains a greater pool of dynamic microtubules. This is likely to reflect different requirements for dynamic instability that arise between the axonal and dendritic compartments, presumably important for establishing their distinct physiologies as neurons mature.
Microtubule polymerization and neuron growth
Imaging of EB1-GFP comets revealed that microtubule polymerization occurs throughout the length of hippocampal neuron axons and dendrites, rather than being restricted solely to regions of active growth, such as axonal growth cones and dendritic tips. As these neurons continued to grow in vitro, however, the number of polymerization events declined within the older established portion of both axonal and dendritic shafts, whereas newer distal regions maintained higher levels of polymerization. Since distal ends constitute regions of active growth, such increased local polymerization suggests a shift toward ongoing assembly of the cytoskeleton on site, with lower level 'maintenance' polymerization along the shaft. Such a mechanism for regulating outgrowth in axons is well-supported (see, for example, ). The findings reported here suggest a similar mechanism for dendrites. Analyses of immunofluorescence showed concentrations of Tyr-tubulin at the distal tips of dendrites, and others have shown that regulation of tubulin polymerization within dendrite tips promotes dendritic growth and arborization [22, 54]. Collectively, these data suggest a critical role for ongoing microtubule polymerization in dendritic arbors as well as axons as neuronal circuits are developing.
Orientation of polymerization and differentiation of dendrites and axons
At the earliest time-points after hippocampal neurons became morphologically polarized, axons and dendrites could not be distinguished by directional patterns of microtubule polymerization. Rather, they began to diverge in the proportion of anterograde to retrograde polymerization events around 3 to 4 DIV. By 7 DIV, axons attained a nearly uniform distribution of anterograde polymerizing microtubules, while dendrites exhibited increased numbers of retrograde polymerization events. Retrograde polymerization had been detected in dendrites previously , a finding anticipated by previous electron microscopy studies [24, 45]. What was unexpected, however, was that the directionality of microtubule polymerization in dendrites never reached roughly equal proportions of anterograde and retrograde events. Even neurons grown for more than 2 weeks in vitro, an age typically deemed mature by morphological and molecular criteria , continued to show a bias toward polymerization in the anterograde direction. One possible interpretation of this finding is that microtubules oriented with minus ends distal (thus polymerizing in the retrograde direction) are more stable than those with plus-ends distal (anterograde polymerizing). Regardless of the explanation for why the proportion of observed retrograde events is less than the expected total distribution of retrogradely oriented microtubules, these data suggest that the directionality of microtubule assembly is not simply proportional to the number of plus-end or minus-end distal microtubules present.
Implications for regulation of growth and plasticity
Our findings show that a large pool of dynamic tyrosinated microtubules is available throughout the dendritic arbor even into maturity, a pattern that is distinctly different from that of axons. A population of dynamic microtubules could enable rapid cytoskeletal changes that support the growth of collateral branches from the dendrite shaft, a form of branching that occurs during outgrowth of the dendritic arbor in cultured hippocampal neurons (G Withers and G Banker, unpublished observations), and is likely to occur in vivo as well [55–57]. In addition, recent reports suggest that microtubule polymerization within the dendritic arbor, including transient forays into spines, could be important for spine formation, morphology, and activity-dependent changes in synapses [58–60]. Axons make collateral branches during pathfinding in development, but once the path is established, maintaining stability might be more important than retaining a capacity sprouting all along the axon tract. In contrast, it appears that the entire dendritic arbor is capable of growth, branch addition, and synapse formation throughout life. Thus, the differences in microtubule stability and dynamic polymerization between axons and dendrites reported here suggest a structural substrate that can account not only for differences in patterns of outgrowth, but also the capacity for plasticity.
Significant differences in the organization of microtubules between dendrites and axons arise during development, but are maintained into maturation. Most notably, higher levels of dynamic tubulin, measured as Tyr-tubulin immunofluorescence, are retained throughout the dendritic arbor, whereas Tyr-tubulin is concentrated at distal growing ends of axons. While differences in microtubule stability can be detected even as neurons are polarizing, the proportion of retrograde to anterograde oriented polymerization diverges 1 to 2 days later, suggesting this aspect of microtubule organization may be more important for later phases of growth and maturation rather than in the initial specification of axons and dendrites.
days in vitro
green fluorescent protein
The EB1-GFP construct was generously provided by Lynn Cassimeris. The authors would like to thank members of the Withers lab and Christopher Wallace for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by a National Science Foundation CAREER award (IBN-0135985) to GW.
- Craig AM, Banker G: Neuronal polarity. Ann Rev Neurosci. 1994, 17: 267-310. 10.1146/annurev.ne.17.030194.001411.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bradke F, Dotti CG: Establishment of neuronal polarity: lessons from cultured hippocampal neurons. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2000, 10: 574-581. 10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00124-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dotti CG, Sullivan CA, Banker GA: The establishment of polarity by hippocampal neurons in culture. J Neurosci. 1988, 8: 1454-1458.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inagaki N, Chihara K, Arimura N, Menager C, Kawano Y, Matusuo N, Nishimura T, Amano M, Kaibuchi K: CRMP-2 induces axons in cultured hippocampal neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2001, 4: 781-782. 10.1038/90476.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fukata Y, Itoh TJ, Kimura T, Ménager C, Nishimura T, Shiromizu T, Watanabe H, Inagaki N, Iwamatsu A, Hotani H, Kaibuchi K: CRMP-2 binds to tubulin heterodimers to promote microtubule assembly. Nat Cell Biol. 2002, 4: 583-591.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Witte H, Neukirchen D, Bradke F: Microtubule stabilization specifieds initial neuronal polarization. J Cell Biol. 2008, 180: 619-632. 10.1083/jcb.200707042.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dehmelt L, Nalbant P, Steffen W, Halpain S: A microtubule-based, dynein-dependent force induces local cell protrusions: Implications for neurite initiation. Brain Cell Biol. 2006, 35: 39-56. 10.1007/s11068-006-9001-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dehmelt L, Halpain S: Actin and microtubules in neurite initiation: are MAPs the missing link?. J Neurobiol. 2004, 58: 18-33. 10.1002/neu.10284.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Esch T, Lemmon V, Banker G: Local presentation of substrate molecules directs axon specification by cultured hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci. 1999, 19: 6417-6426.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruthel G, Banker G: Role of moving growth cone-like 'wave' structures in the otugrowth of cultured hippocampal axons and dendrites. J Neurobiol. 1999, 39: 97-106. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(199904)39:1<97::AID-NEU8>3.0.CO;2-Z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fletcher T, DeCamilli P, Banker G: Synaptogenesis in hippocampal cultures: evidence indicating the axons and dendrites become competent to form synapses at different stages of neuronal development. J Neurosci. 1994, 14: 6695-6706.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Craig A, Graf E, Linhoff M: How to build a central synapse: clues from cell culture. Trends Neurosci. 2006, 29: 8-20. 10.1016/j.tins.2005.11.002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ahmad FJ, He Y, Myers K, Hasaka T, Francis F, Black MM, Baas PW: Effects of dynactin disruption and dynein depletion on axonal microtubules. Traffic. 2006, 7: 524-537. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00403.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baas PW, Karabay A, Qiang L: Microtubules cut and run. Trends Cell Biol. 2005, 15: 518-524. 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.08.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bamburg JR, Bray D, Chapman K: Assembly of microtubules at the tip of growing axons. Nature. 1986, 321: 788-790. 10.1038/321788a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dent EW, Callaway JL, Szebenyi G, Baas PW, Kalil K: Reorganization and movement of microtubules in axonal growth cones and developing interstitial branches. J Neurosci. 1999, 19: 8894-8908.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gallo G, Letourneau PC: Different contributions of microtubule dynamics and transport to the growth of axons and collateral sprouts. J Neurosci. 1999, 19: 3860-3873.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brown A, Li Y, Slaughter T, Black MM: Composite microtubules of the axon: quantative analysis of tyrsoinated and acetylated alpha-tubulin alon axonal microtubules. J Cell Sci. 1993, 104: 339-352.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brown A, Slaughter T, Black MM: Newly assembled microtubules are concentrated in the proximal and distal regions of growing axons. J Cell Biol. 1992, 119: 867-882. 10.1083/jcb.119.4.867.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baas PW, Ahmad FJ, Pienkowski TP, Brown A, Black MM: Sites of microtubule stabilization for the axon. J Neurosci. 1993, 13: 2177-2185.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shea TB: Selective stabilization of microtubules within the proximal region of developing axonal neurites. Brain Res Bull. 1999, 48: 255-261. 10.1016/S0361-9230(98)00019-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Akum BF, Chen M, Gunderson SI, Riefler GM, Scerri-Hansen MM, Firestein BL: Cypin regulates dendrite patterning in hippocampal neurons by promoting microtubule assembly. Nat Neurosci. 2004, 7: 145-152. 10.1038/nn1179.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen H, Firestein BL: RhoA regulates dendrite branching in hippocampal neurons by decreasing cypin protein levels. J Neurosci. 2007, 27: 8378-8386. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0872-07.2007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baas PW, Deitch JS, Black MM, Banker GA: Polarity orientation of microtubules in hippocampal neurons: uniformity in the axon and nonuniformity in the dendrite. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988, 85: 8335-8339. 10.1073/pnas.85.21.8335.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morrison EE: Action and interactions a microtubule ends. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007, 64: 307-317. 10.1007/s00018-007-6360-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lansbergen G, Akhmanova A: Microtubule plus end: a hub of cellular activities. Traffic. 2006, 7: 499-507. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00400.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ma Y, Shakiryanove D, Vardya I, Popov SV: Quantitative analysis of microtubule transport in growing nerve processes. Curr Biol. 2004, 14: 725-730. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.061.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim T, Chang S: Quantative evaluation of the mode of microtubule transport in Xenopus neurons. Mol Cells. 2006, 21: 76-81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakata T, Hirokawa N: Microtubules provide directional cues for polarized axonal transport through interaction with kinesin motor head. J Cell Biol. 2003, 162: 1045-1055. 10.1083/jcb.200302175.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stepanova T, Slemmer J, Hoogenraad CC, Lansbergen G, Dortland B, Zeeuw CID, Grosveld F, Cappellen Gv, Akhmanova A, Galjart N: Visualization of microtubule growth in cultured neurons via the use of EB3-GFP (end-binding protein 3-green fluorescent protein). J Neurosci. 2003, 23: 2655-2664.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rolls MM, Satoh D, Clyne PJ, Henner AL, Uemura T, Doe CQ: Polarity and intracellular compartmentalization of Drosophila neurons. Neural Dev. 2007, 2: 7-10.1186/1749-8104-2-7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morrison EE, Wardleworth BN, Askham JM, Markham AF, Meredith DM: EB1, a protein which interacts with the APC tumour suppressor, is associated with the microtubule cytoskeleton throughout the cell cycle. Oncogene. 1998, 17: 3471-3477. 10.1038/sj.onc.1202247.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morrison EE, Moncur PM, Askham JM: EB1 identifies sites of microtubule polymerisation during neurite development. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2002, 98: 145-152. 10.1016/S0169-328X(01)00290-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Piehl M, Cassimeris L: Organization and dynamics of growing microtubule plus ends during early mitosis. Mol Biol Cell. 2003, 14: 916-925. 10.1091/mbc.E02-09-0607.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zheng Y, Wildonger J, Ye B, Zhang Y, Kita A, Younger SH, Zimmerman S, Jan LY, Jan YN: Dynein is required for polarized dendritic transport and uniform microtubule orientaation in axons. Nat Cell Biol. 2008, 10: 1172-1180. 10.1038/ncb1777.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bulinski JC, Gungersen GG: Stabilization and post-translational modification of microtubules during cellular morphogenesis. Bioessays. 1991, 13: 285-293. 10.1002/bies.950130605.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Piperno G, LeDizet M, Chang XJ: Microtubules containing acetylated alpha-tubulin in mammalian cells in culture. J Cell Biol. 1987, 104: 289-302. 10.1083/jcb.104.2.289.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Banker GA, Goslin K: Culturing Nerve Cells. 1998, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2Google Scholar
- Bottenstein JE, Sato GH: Growth of a rat neuroblastoma cell line in serum-free supplemented medium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979, 76: 514-517. 10.1073/pnas.76.1.514.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Greene LA, Tischler AS: Establishment of a noradrenergic clonal line of rat adrenal pheochromocytoma cells which respond to nerve growth factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1976, 73: 647-648. 10.1073/pnas.73.7.2424.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lambeng N, Michel PP, Brugg B, Agid Y, Ruberg M: Mechanisms of apoptosis in PC12 cells irreversibly differentiated with nerve growth factor and cyclic AMP. Brain Res. 1999, 821: 60-68. 10.1016/S0006-8993(99)01061-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ahmad FJ, Yu W, McNally FJ, Baas PW: An essential role for katanin in severing microtubules in the neuron. J Cell Biol. 1999, 145: 305-315. 10.1083/jcb.145.2.305.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Withers GS, Banker G: Characterizing and studying neuronal cultures. Culturing Nerve Cells. Edited by: Banker G, Goslin K. 1998, Cambridge: MIT Press, 113-151. 2Google Scholar
- Baas PW, Black MM: Individual microtubules in the axon consist of domains that differ in both composition and stability. J Cell Biol. 1990, 111: 495-509. 10.1083/jcb.111.2.495.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baas PW, Black MM, Banker GA: Changes in microtubule polarity orientation during the development of hippocampal neurons in culture. J Cell Biol. 1989, 109: 3085-3094. 10.1083/jcb.109.6.3085.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Satoh D, Sato D, Tsuyama T, Saito M, Ohkura H, Rolls M, Ishikawa F, Uemura T: Spatial control of branching within dendritic arbors by dynein-dependent transport of Rab5-endosomes. Nat Cell Biol. 2008, 10: 1164-1171. 10.1038/ncb1776.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baas PW, Slaughter T, Brown A, Black MM: Microtubule dynamics in axons and dendrites. J Neurosci Res. 1991, 30: 134-153. 10.1002/jnr.490300115.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Creppe C, Malinouskaya L, Volvert ML, Gillard M, Close P, Malaise O, Laguesse S, Cornez I, Rahmouni S, Ormenese S, Belachew S, Malgrange B, Chapelle JP, Siebenlist U, Moonen G, Chariot A, Nguyen L: Elongator controls the migration and diferentiation of cortical neurons through acetylation of alpha-tubulin. Cell. 2009, 136: 551-564. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.043.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Erck C, Peris L, Andrieux A, Meissirel C, Gruber AD, Vernet M, Schweitzer A, Saoudi Y, Pointu H, Bosc C, Salin PA, Job D, Wehland J: A vital role of tubulin-tyrosine-ligase for neuronal organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 7853-7858. 10.1073/pnas.0409626102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peris L, Thery M, Fauré J, Saoudi Y, Lafanechère L, Chilton JK, Gordon-Weeks P, Galjart N, Bornens M, Wordeman L, Wehland J, Andrieux A, Job D: Tubulin tyrosination is a major factor affecting the recruitment of CAP-Gly proteins at microtubule ends. J Cell Biol. 2006, 174: 839-849. 10.1083/jcb.200512058.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dunn S, Morrison EE, Liverpool TB, Molina-Paris C, Cross RA, Alonso MC, Peckham M: Differential trafficking of Kif5c ontyrosinated and detyrosinated microtubules in live cells. J Cell Sci. 2008, 121: 1085-1095. 10.1242/jcs.026492.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reed N, Cai D, Blasius T, Jih G, Meyhofer E, Gaertig J, Verhey K: Microtubule acetylation promotes kinesin-1 binding and transport. Curr Biol. 2006, 16: 2166-2172. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kalil K, Dent EW: Hot +TIPS: guidance cues signal directly to microtubules. Neuron. 2004, 42 (6): 877-879. 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.06.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen M, Lucas KG, Akum BF, Balasingam G, Stawicki TM, Provost JM, Riefler GM, Jornsten RJ, Firestein BL: A novel role for snapin in dendrite patterning: interaction with cypin. Mol Biol Cell. 2005, 16: 5103-5114. 10.1091/mbc.E05-02-0165.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wong RO, Ghosh A: Activity-dependent regulation of dendritic growth and patterning. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002, 3: 803-812. 10.1038/nrn941.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klintsova AY, Greenough W: Synaptic plasticity in cortical systems. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999, 9: 203-208. 10.1016/S0959-4388(99)80028-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cline H, Haas K: The regulation of dendritic arbor development and plasticity by glutamatergic synaptic input: a review of the synaptotrophic hypothesis. J Physiol. 2008, 586: 1509-1517. 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.150029.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gu J, Firestein BL, Zheng JQ: Microtubules in dendritic spine development. J Neurosci. 2008, 28: 12120-12124. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2509-08.2008.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hu X, Viesselmann C, Nam S, Merriam E, Dent EW: Activity-dependent dynamic microtubule invasion of dendritic spines. J Neurosci. 2008, 28: 13094-13105. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3074-08.2008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jaworski J, Kapitein LC, Gouveia SM, Dortland BR, Wulf PS, Grigoriev I, Camera P, Spangler SA, Di Stefano P, Demmers J, Krugers H, Defilippi P, Akhmanova A, Hoogenraad CC: Dynamic microtubules regulate dendritic spine morphology and synaptic plasticity. Neuron. 2009, 61: 85-100. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.11.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.