Interactions between innexins UNC-7 and UNC-9 mediate electrical synapse specificity in the Caenorhabditis elegans locomotory nervous system
© Starich et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 29 December 2008
Accepted: 11 May 2009
Published: 11 May 2009
Approximately 10% of Caenorhabditis elegans nervous system synapses are electrical, that is, gap junctions composed of innexins. The locomotory nervous system consists of several pairs of interneurons and three major classes of motor neurons, all with stereotypical patterns of connectivity that include gap junctions. Mutations in the two innexin genes unc-7 and unc-9 result in identical uncoordinated movement phenotypes, and their respective gene products were investigated for their contribution to electrical synapse connectivity.
unc-7 encodes three innexin isoforms. Two of these, UNC-7S and UNC-7SR, are functionally equivalent and play an essential role in coordinated locomotion. UNC-7S and UNC-7SR are widely expressed and co-localize extensively with green fluorescent protein-tagged innexin UNC-9 in the ventral and dorsal nerve cords. A subset of UNC-7S/SR expression visualizes gap junctions formed between the AVB forward command interneurons and their B class motor neuron partners. Experiments indicate that expression of UNC-7S/SR in AVB and expression of UNC-9 in B motor neurons is necessary for these gap junctions to form. In Xenopus oocyte pairs, both UNC-7S and UNC-9 form homomeric gap junctions, and together they form heterotypic channels. Xenopus oocyte studies and co-localization studies in C. elegans suggest that UNC-7S and UNC-9 do not heteromerize in the same hemichannel, leading to the model that hemichannels in AVB:B motor neuron gap junctions are homomeric and heterotypic.
UNC-7S and UNC-9 are widely expressed and contribute to a large number of the gap junctions identified in the locomotory nervous system. Proper AVB:B gap junction formation requires UNC-7S expression in AVB interneurons and UNC-9 expression in B motor neurons. More broadly, this illustrates that innexin identity is critical for electrical synapse specificity, but differential (compartmentalized) innexin expression cannot account for all of the specificity seen in C. elegans, and other factors must influence the determination of synaptic partners.
Gap junctions mediate intercellular communication through diffusion of small (1 kDa) molecules. Single gap junction channels are formed from half channels (hemichannels) contributed by apposing cells. The six subunits forming a hemichannel may be homomeric or heteromeric, and the hemichannels in one channel may be identical (homotypic) or not (heterotypic). Until recently it was thought that all vertebrate gap junction subunits are connexins, and invertebrate gap junction proteins are innexins [1, 2]. Although connexins and innexins share functional properties, they are likely unrelated evolutionarily [1, 3]. Members of a third protein family, the pannexins, were recently shown to form gap junction channels . Pannexins are found in vertebrates and lower chordates [5, 6] and share sufficient sequence similarity with innexins to be considered related. Individual connexin, innexin and pannexin proteins have all been shown to form gap junction channels with similar properties as assayed in paired Xenopus oocytes (for example, [4, 7, 8]).
Previously we showed that the innexin unc-7 gene is essential for coordinated locomotion in C. elegans . We are using unc-7 as a means to understand how electrical synapses are specifically established between cell partners. Electrical synapses are widespread in invertebrates and vertebrates [10–12]. Approximately 600 electrical synapses and 5,000 chemical synapses were described in the reconstruction of the C. elegans non-pharyngeal nervous system . Although most neurons make electrical synapses, they do not form gap junctions with all available neighbors; little is known about how such selectivity is achieved. Because subunit composition can influence the docking between hemichannels , it might be possible to pattern synaptic connections through selective expression of innexins, of which 25 exist in C. elegans (reviewed in ). Alternatively, electrical synaptic specificity might be determined through other means, such as activity dependence.
unc-7 mutants are severely uncoordinated. Instead of propagating smooth sinusoidal waves they kink. Forward and backward movement are both affected, but the forward Unc phenotype is more severe. The cause of the Unc phenotype is unknown but could be due to loss of functional gap junctions or to extra ectopic gap junctions established between AVA interneurons and B motor neurons, noted in EM serial sections of an unc-7(e5) animal (White et al., personal communication, originally cited in ; Figure 1). The related unc-9 innexin gene  has an Unc phenotype similar to that of unc-7, but no EM reconstruction data for unc-9 are available.
To gain an understanding of how electrical synapses specifically form between neurons, we are interested in determining which gap junctions identified in the reconstruction of the nervous system have UNC-7 as a component, which other innexins contribute to these junctions, what determines specificity for forming complete channels, and how these gap junctions function to direct information flow in the nervous system. We demonstrate that the formation of specific gap junctions between AVB and B motor neurons depends on interactions between unc-7 and unc-9 gene products, and that the expression of unc-7 and unc-9 influences formation of a large proportion of the gap junctions in the locomotory nervous system.
unc-7(e5) mutants lack functional gap junction channels
Since unc-7 encodes a gap junction protein, we presumed that the mutant Unc-7 uncoordinated phenotype reflects a loss of functional gap junction channels. However, partial EM reconstruction of an unc-7(e5) mutant revealed ectopic gap junctions formed between AVA interneurons that direct backward movement and B class motor neurons involved in forward movement. No other connectivity changes were noted. Therefore, part of the characterization of the Unc-7 phenotype involves understanding how ectopic gap junction channels arise in the absence of the UNC-7 innexin, and whether or not these ectopic neuronal connections contribute to the Unc phenotype.
Anti-UNC-7 staining pattern
Strong nr, rvg; weak vnc, dnc
Strong nr, rvg; weak vnc, dnc
Weak signal, mostly cytoplasmic
Translocation; break point in intron 1
Strong nr, rvg; weak vnc, dnc
6-kb deletion, intron 1
Strong nr, rvg; weak vnc, dnc
2-kb insertion, intron 1
Weak signal, mostly cytoplasmic
One hypothesis for unc-7 uncoordination is that ectopic AVA:B motor neuron gap junctions interfere with forward locomotion. If ectopic gap junctions are the sole cause of the Unc-7 phenotype, then laser ablation of AVAs should eliminate communication between these interneurons and the B motor neurons and restore normal forward locomotion; in conjunction with AVA ablation, animals should be backward Unc (Figure 1). We targeted AVA interneurons for ablation in ten wild-type L1 stage animals. Eight animals displayed a severe backward Unc phenotype but were still capable of forward locomotion, confirming that AVAs had been properly ablated. The AVA interneurons in ten unc-7(e5) L1 animals were then targeted; none displayed improvement in forward locomotion, supporting the conclusion that ectopic AVA:B gap junctions are not the sole cause of the Unc-7 phenotype. Therefore, the Unc-7 locomotory defect reflects loss of unc-7 gap junction channel function, regardless of ectopic gap junction formation, and we sought to determine which gap junctions in the nervous system include UNC-7 as a component.
Two isoforms of UNC-7 rescue locomotion
The shortest genomic region capable of rescuing forward and backward locomotion defects in unc-7 mutants encompassed the coding region of unc-7 and 1 kb of promoter sequence upstream of exon 2 (unc-7 min; Figure 3B). This construct included a frame-shift mutation within the unique amino terminus of UNC-7L that eliminated its production, indicating that UNC-7S alone is sufficient for unc-7 function. A shorter version of unc-7 min lacked promoter sequences upstream of exon 2 (unc-7S::gfp; Figure 3C) and rescued forward but not backward locomotion, suggesting that promoter sequences in intron 3 (Punc-7S; Figure 3C) drive a subset of UNC-7S expression sufficient to rescue only forward movement. When co-injected with F56B12, the unc-7S::gfp construct rescued both forward and reverse locomotion.
Evidence for a second functional isoform of UNC-7 was obtained. UNC-7S expression was eliminated by deleting the UNC-7S translational start site in exon 1S (unc-7SΔ1S; Figure 3D). Like unc-7S::gfp, this construct rescued forward locomotion in the absence of cosmid F56B12, and we postulated that M121 in exon IV (the canonical innexin start site) might be used to generate a shorter but functional UNC-7S-like product (UNC-7SR).
Western blot analyses were consistent with this interpretation. Using anti-GFP antibodies, two major protein bands, not present in wild-type, were detected in unc-7(e5) animals rescued with unc-7S::GFP + F56B12 (Figure 3H). These bands approximated the sizes predicted for UNC-7S::GFP and UNC-7SR::GFP. In animals rescued with unc-7SΔ1S + F56B12, predicted to express UNC-7SR::GFP but not UNC-7S::GFP, only the smaller band was detected.
Inclusion of F56B12 in rescue experiments allowed for translation of UNC-7L::GFP, but no corresponding protein band was identified on western blots. To determine if UNC-7L might have functional activity, we tried to eliminate expression of predicted UNC-7S and UNC-7SR isoforms. The Punc-7S promoter sequences in intron 3 were eliminated by substituting this region with unc-7 cDNA sequence from exons 2–6 (unc-7-2cDNA6; Figure 3E). This construct (plus F56B12) fully rescued unc-7(e5), suggesting that either UNC-7L can rescue locomotion, or UNC-7SR is produced through internal translation initiating at M121. M121 was mutated to L in unc-7SΔ1S; this construct (unc-7SΔ1S-M121L; Figure 3F) plus F56B12 failed to rescue unc-7, suggesting that UNC-7L does not have rescuing activity. To demonstrate that mutation of M121 did not lead to loss of an essential protein function, exon 1S was added back to allow for expression of UNC-7S(M121L), and this construct (unc-7S-M121L; Figure 3G) fully rescued. Therefore, unc-7 locomotion defects can be rescued by either UNC-7S or UNC-7SR, but UNC-7L cannot substitute for this function (although it may have a subtle role or function in another process). Furthermore, it appears that UNC-7SR can be produced by internal translation (Figure 3E). We will refer to the predicted products of the unc-7 rescuing transcript as UNC-7S with the understanding that UNC-7SR is also translated.
UNC-7 is expressed throughout the nervous system
Neurons identified by total UNC-7 or UNC-7::GFP expression
Gap junction partners*
ASn, DAn, VAn, SAB, PVC, RIM, URY, AVA, (DB5)
AVA, VAn, (SAB, PHC)
AVB, DBn, VBn
AVA, ASn, VAn, (PHC, VB11)
AVB, DBn, VBn
VDn, DDn, PVP (VD1 only: SMDDR, VB1, VB2, RIFL, RIGL, DVC)
AVM, PVR, (AVDR)
AVL, PVP, VD1
PVC, PVM, VD9
Neurons identified by Punc-7S expression
Gap junction partners*
AFD, DVB, DVC, RIG, RIS, RIV
ASn, DAn, VAn, SAB, PVC, RIM, URY, AVA, (DB5)
DBn, VBn, DVA, PVN, RIB, RID, SDQ, SIBV, AVB
RIM, RMD, RME, AVE
AVF, PHB, AVH
ADE, AQR, DVB, PVP, RIC, RIG, SMB, AVK
AVD, RIH, FLP
PVC, PVM, VD9
AIB, AVJ, RIM, SMD
AIB, SDQ, SMDD, SMDV
AVE, OLQ, RMD, RMDD, RMDV, SAA, SMDV, (muscle arms)
GLRD, IL1V, RIP, RMEV
AVE, GLRV, IL1D, RIP, RMEL/R, RMED
AIM, RIB, SIBV
AVK, RIB, SAAD
RIB, RMDD, RIS
RIB, RIS, RMDV, SMDV
RIP, I1, (I2, I5)
Because UNC-7SΔ::GFP was not a rescuing construct, we also examined expression of the equivalent construct consisting of only native unc-7 sequences (unc-7S; Figure 3C, lacking GFP) using anti-UNC-7. As expected, this construct (minus F56B12) rescued forward but not backward locomotion, and UNC-7S was strongly expressed as puncta in the nerve ring and ventral nerve cord, but not the dorsal nerve cord (consistent with lack of DA and DB motor neuron expression). Together these studies suggest that Punc-7S drives expression of UNC-7S in a subset of neurons (including AVA and AVB, but not motor neurons) that can effect rescue of forward locomotion, and promoter sequences upstream of exon 2 drive additional expression of UNC-7S in motor neurons or possibly other neurons required to fully rescue all unc-7 locomotory defects.
Other neuronal innexins are candidates for contributing to the locomotory nervous system
INX-1::GFP is expressed in the nerve ring, ventral and dorsal nerve cords, and pharynx and body muscles (Figure 5B, C). Expression in DB and DA motor neurons can be seen in L1 stage larvae. Co-staining with anti-UNC-7 does not reveal any co-localization with INX-1::GFP (not shown), and expression of INX-1::GFP in unc-7(e5) mutants does not grossly affect its expression. INX-1::GFP appears to lie in a different focal plane from UNC-7 in the nerve cords (which may relate to expression in highly-coupled muscle arms that extend to the nerve cords). In larvae, NSY-5/INX-19::GFP is strongly expressed in OLL and AVB interneurons (Figure 5D), and weakly in a few other neurons, including AVA; more neurons express nsy-5/inx-19::gfp embryonically. Therefore, NSY-5/INX-19 could contribute to coordinated locomotion via expression in relevant command interneurons.
INX-4::GFP does not appear to be expressed in neurons implicated in locomotion, but is expressed in a number of ciliated neurons, pharyngeal m1 muscle cells, and the RIP neurons that form gap junctions with pharyngeal I1 neurons (Figure 5E). As such it is a candidate for potentially interacting with UNC-7S in the pharynx, and with NSY-5/INX-19 expressed in an overlapping set of sensory neurons .
UNC-9::GFP was broadly expressed throughout the nervous system in a pattern that greatly resembled UNC-7S, and we focused on potential interactions between UNC-7S and UNC-9, as described following.
UNC-7 and UNC-9::GFP co-localize
Transformation rescue was used to assess how well UNC-9::GFP might represent native UNC-9 expression. First, the genomic region represented by the unc-9::gfp construct was shown to fully rescue unc-9(fc16) animals, indicating that this region is sufficient to encode a functional unc-9 product. GFP was positioned at the carboxyl terminus of UNC-9, without loss or interruption of UNC-9 sequence. The unc-9::gfp construct partially rescued uncoordinated locomotion in unc-9(fc16) – hermaphrodites exhibit wild-type forward movement interrupted with bouts of spastic kinking. Possibly the GFP moiety interferes with function to some extent.
unc-7 and unc-9 have identical Unc phenotypes. The co-localization of UNC-7 and UNC-9 suggested that these gene products interact. To test whether unc-7 and unc-9 might function in a common pathway, an unc-9(fc16) daf-6(e1377) unc-7(e5) X strain was constructed. unc-9(fc16) represents a probable null mutation . daf-6 was used to facilitate construction and has no locomotory defects . The phenotype of unc-9 daf-6 unc-7 mutants was no more severe than unc-7 alone, consistent with UNC-7 and UNC-9 acting in the same process.
UNC-7S requires UNC-9 for localization
We postulated that UNC-7S might rescue forward locomotion by providing a gap junction subunit in AVB hemichannels that form channels with B class motor neurons. Analysis of the expression pattern from the unc-7::Sgfp construct showed no evidence of motor neuron expression; therefore, it appeared that either expression of UNC-7S::GFP in motor neurons is not required for AVB:B motor neuron gap junctions to form, or analysis of the Punc-7S promoter failed to detect low levels of motor neuron expression.
If UNC-7S expressed in AVB contributes to AVB:B motor neuron gap junctions, then UNC-9 might interact with UNC-7S in these junctions to form heteromeric or heterotypic channels important for coordinated movement. To examine co-localization of interneuron-expressed UNC-7S and total UNC-9::GFP, the unc-7S construct (Figure 3C, minus GFP) was used to rescue forward locomotion in unc-7(e5) mutants expressing UNC-9::GFP. UNC-7S co-localized completely with UNC-9::GFP in the ventral nerve cord, although, as expected, total UNC-9::GFP signal was more extensive (Figure 6C).
To attempt visualization of neuron cell bodies expressing unc-9, a second UNC-9 construct was made with GFP positioned near TM4; UNC-9Δ::GFP was detected in all motor neuron classes and AVA and AVB interneurons (Figure 6D, E), as well as body muscles and other unidentified neurons. With respect to UNC-7S co-localization, this indicated that UNC-9 could potentially contribute subunits to hemichannels in the motor neurons, in AVB, or in both, and UNC-9 may play a role in the formation of ectopic gap junctions noted in unc-7(e5) (between AVA and B class motor neurons). To further explore a potential relationship, expression from the unc-7S::gfp construct was examined in unc-9(fc16) daf-6 unc-7(e5) mutants, where UNC-7S::GFP failed to localize near B motor neuron cell bodies but instead was diffusely distributed as small puncta throughout the ventral nerve cord (Figure 7D). This pattern was recapitulated in unc-9(fc16) single mutants (Figure 7E), indicating that UNC-9 is required for the proper assembly of UNC-7S-containing AVB:B motor neuron gap junctions. It is possible that UNC-7S could require UNC-9 as a heteromeric co-assembly partner in AVB hemichannels, or as a heterotypic docking partner in B motor neuron hemichannels.
UNC-9 motor neuron expression rescues UNC-7S localization
Heterologous promoters were used to refine where UNC-7S and UNC-9 are required for AVB:B motor neuron gap junction formation. The Pacr-5 promoter is expressed in B motor neurons but not AVB or AVA interneurons . The unc-7S::gfp construct was introduced with Pacr-5::unc-9 into unc-9(fc16) daf-6 unc-7(e5) mutants. UNC-7S::GFP localized to presumptive AVB:B motor neuron gap junctions (Figure 7F), indicating that UNC-9 expressed in motor neurons is sufficient for this localization. It also suggests that in unc-9 mutants, the native UNC-7 isoforms expressed in motor neurons (as detected by previous analysis of total UNC-7 expression) are insufficient to properly localize AVB-expressed UNC-7S::GFP (that is, UNC-7 in motor neurons does not substitute for UNC-9 in localizing AVB-expressed UNC-7S).
To verify an AVB but not motor neuron requirement for UNC-7S, UNC-7S::GFP under control of the sra-11 promoter  was expressed in unc-7(e5). Psra-11::unc-7S::gfp was detected in AVB, ALA, the pharyngeal neuron I4, an unidentified pair of neurons anterior to the nerve ring, and, in later larval stages, the VC motor neurons (but not A or B class motor neurons). GFP was seen in puncta near B class motor neuron cell bodies (Figure 7G), although these were generally not as pronounced as with unc-7S::gfp. When Psra-11::unc-7S::gfp was expressed in unc-9 daf-6 unc-7, puncta were not preferentially localized near B motor neurons (Figure 7H), but when co-injected with Pacr-5::unc-9 (B motor neurons) UNC-7S::GFP localization was restored (Figure 7I). These results further support the model that UNC-9 is sufficient in B motor neurons for gap junctions to form with UNC-7S in AVB.
We asked if UNC-9 expression in AVB might substitute for loss of UNC-7S and form gap junction channels with UNC-9 expressed in B motor neurons. Punc-7S::unc-9::gfp was expressed in unc-7(e5) mutants; UNC-9::GFP was broadly but weakly expressed as small puncta throughout the ventral nerve cord (Figure 7J), a pattern reminiscent of UNC-7S expression in unc-9 unc-7 double mutants (Figure 7D). Some of these puncta could potentially be associated with B motor neuron cell bodies – they appeared to be offset from other puncta expressed along the ventral nerve cord – but the intensity of their signal did not stand out compared to other puncta. If homotypic UNC-9 channels form between AVB and B motor neurons, they do not appear to lead to the establishment of electrical synapses as robust as those formed between UNC-7S and UNC-9 hemichannels. We conclude that there is a specific requirement for expression of the UNC-7S innexin in AVB to properly establish AVB:B gap junctions.
UNC-9::GFP expressed in B motor neurons is mis-localized in unc-7 mutants
In unc-9 mutants, the brightest UNC-9::GFP puncta are still localized near B cell bodies, but more puncta are distributed elsewhere along the cord compared to wild-type (Figure 8C). We can only speculate as to why there is a wider distribution of UNC-9::GFP puncta in an unc-9 background. Our genomic unc-9::gfp construct was found to only partially rescue unc-9 mutants. Perhaps in wild-type animals, association of native UNC-9 with UNC-9::GFP in the same hemichannels allows for stricter control of UNC-9::GFP distribution than in unc-9 mutants.
In unc-9 unc-7 double mutants, the UNC-9::GFP signal is qualitatively different – few bright punta arise, expression is more diffuse, and the GFP signal often concentrates in the cell soma of some B motor neurons, allowing for their visualization.
UNC-7 and UNC-9 form channels in Xenopus oocytes
All UNC isoforms were also tested for the ability to form heterotypic channels, given the indications from localization studies that AVB:B motor neuron gap junctions are likely heterotypic. UNC-7S and UNC-7L each formed heterotypic channels with UNC-9, with asymmetric gating profiles that again were essentially indistinguishable from one another (Figure 9D, E). Given that the gating profile when the UNC-7S or L side is relatively negative (UNC-9 positive) is similar to that of homotypic UNC-7, and when UNC-9 is relatively negative the limited gating response resembles UNC-9 homotypic, we conclude that these members of the innexin family close the series gate on the negative side (this is the reverse of most, but not all, connexins ). However, it did appear that the hemichannels of all of the innexins studied here showed a higher sensitity to Vj in the heterotypic conformation compared to the homotypic, as reflected in lower Gmins and V0, and higher A values (Additional file 3). The asymmetry of the Vj response of these UNC-7:UNC-9 heterotypic channels was not restricted to the steady state response of these cells, but also was seen in the rectifying nature of the initial conductance that increases as the UNC-9 cell becomes more positive. Such rectifying behavior has been reported for some connexins, and has been shown to arise from the pairing of two hemichannels with different ion selectivities . Based on these previous modeling studies, we would predict that UNC-9 channels are more cation selective than either of the UNC-7 isoforms.
The UNC-7 isoforms were also found to form heterotypic channels with one another (Figure 9F). These channels were more symmetric, but did show some differences, particularly in terms of the Gmin for each side and the rectification of Gj0. We also tested more complex pairings by co-expressing multiple innexins within one cell. UNC-7S was expressed in one oocyte and equal amounts of UNC-7L and UNC-9 RNA were injected in the other. The channels showed a Vj gating profile that was intermediate between UNC-7S:UNC-9 (Figure 9D) and UNC-7S:UNC-7L channels (Figure 9F) in that the Gj0 response was intermediate between those of UNC-7S:UNC-9 and UNC-7S:UNC-7L pairings, while the Gj∞ was similar to the UNC-7S:UNC-7L pairing (see Boltzmann parameters in Additional file 3). This could be interpreted as UNC-7L and UNC-9 forming heteromeric channels, with ion selectivity properties that are influenced by both isoforms (as this dictates the rectification of Gj0), but Vj gating properties dominated by UNC-7L (as this dictates the shape of the Gj∞ plot). Alternatively, the data could also be consistent with a mixture of heterotypic pairings of UNC-7S hemichannels with homomeric UNC-7L or UNC-9 hemichannels, where pairings with UNC-7L are favored (explaining the dominant influence of UNC-7L on Gj∞). Even in the case of Gj0, the response is somewhat more similar to an UNC-7 response than UNC-9, and thus is not inconsistent with this model.
The marked similarity between the voltage gating behavior of UNC-7S and L could indicate that the amino terminus has little effect on voltage gating of these channels, in stark contrast to what has been found for connexins (summarized in ); alternatively, it is possible that both unc-7 expression constructs might utilize the internal start site (M121) and similarly produce UNC-7SR. To test this possibility, UNC-7L(M121L) mRNA was transcribed from pCS2+. This mRNA, which should no longer generate the UNC-7SR product, failed to produce intercellular currents in oocytes, suggesting that the previously observed UNC-7L currents may reflect inclusion of UNC-7SR translation products. However, the asymmetry seen in the UNC-7S:UNC-7L pairings (Figure 9F) may indicate that some of the full length translation product, while not capable of forming functional channels alone, could possibly combine with the shorter product and modify its gating. Results from SDS-PAGE analysis of in vitro translation products derived from UNC-7 mRNAs (in rabbit reticulocyte lysates) are consistent with this interpretation (Additional file 4).
UNC-7L and UNC-7S fail to heteromerize with UNC-9::GFP
When expressed under control of the Punc-7S promoter, UNC-7L (Punc-7S::unc-7L [M121L]) rescued unc-7(e5) forward locomotion; though much of the signal remained associated with cell bodies, some puncta were seen localized to AVB:B motor neuron gap junctions (Figure 10D). We asked if it was possible for UNC-7L to associate with UNC-9 in B class motor neurons. UNC-9::GFP and UNC-7L were co-expressed (Pacr-5::unc-9::gfp and Pacr-5::unc-7L [M121L]) in unc-9 daf-6 unc-7 animals. UNC-9::GFP was widely expressed in the ventral nerve cord as puncta, but UNC-7L was principally associated with cell bodies, and no co-localization was observed (Figure 10E). It therefore appears unlikely that UNC-9 heteromerizes with either UNC-7S or L isoforms. This result helps in the interpretation of the Xenopus oocyte studies, which now would suggest that UNC-7S in one cell would favor pairing heterotypically with UNC-7L over UNC-9 homomeric hemichannels expressed in the apposed cell. If this preferential pairing also worked in the opposite direction (that is, UNC-9 prefers to pair with UNC-9 over UNC-7 channels) this could explain why mis-expression or over-expression of UNC-9 in AVB (or other neurons) might interfere with UNC-7S localization to AVB:B motor neuron gap junctions. UNC-9 expressed in AVB cells might be expected to compete with, and displace, endogenous UNC-7S from these gap junctions.
Function of AVB:B motor neuron gap junctions
Rescue of forward locomotion in unc-7 mutants coincided with localization of UNC-7S to AVB:B motor neuron gap junctions; an attractive model emerged that UNC-7S in AVB might rescue forward locomotion by docking with UNC-9 in B motor neurons, restoring functional gap junctions. Psra-11::unc-7S::gfp expressed in AVB did not rescue forward locomotion in e5 animals; the Pcex-1::unc-7s:gfp construct, expressed in AVA and AVD but not AVB, did, however, rescue e5 forward locomotion. Therefore, one common feature of heterologous promoter::UNC-7S fusions that rescued forward locomotion was expression in AVA. AVA interneurons are implicated primarily in reverse rather than forward locomotion. Could undetectably low levels of UNC-7S expression driven by heterologous promoters in AVB account for rescue? To address this, genetic mosaic analysis of rescue of forward locomotion by the unc-7S construct was carried out. Briefly, we screened for mosaic animals that had lost the rescuing array somewhere in the AB lineage (giving rise to virtually all the interneurons and motor neurons implicated in locomotion) but still showed good forward movement. Results were consistent with an AVA requirement for UNC-7S expression (Additional file 5), suggesting that the formation of AVB:B gap junctions alone is insufficient to rescue forward movement. Rescue of forward locomotion through AVA expression of UNC-7S may indicate some underlying plasticity to the neural circuitry instructing locomotion.
UNC-7 and UNC-9 interactions
A major motivation for characterizing unc-7 and unc-9 was to investigate how specificity of gap junction formation between neurons might be achieved. Although numerous studies have provided insights into factors impacting neural process migration, there is little understanding of how neurons make their final target selection. Understanding how electrical synapses are established may relate to the general question of how neurons recognize their eventual targets.
In the ventral nerve cord of C. elegans, neurons of the locomotory nervous system form gap junctions with some neighbors but not others; the mechanisms regulating recognition and formation of gap junctions between synaptic partners are unknown. From numerous studies in the Xenopus paired oocyte system and various cell culture systems, a reasonable assumption might be that if two cells express the same connexin or innexin and lie in close membrane apposition, gap junctions will probably be established between them; this assumption has not been investigated rigorously in vivo. Reconstruction of the C. elegans nervous system by EM serial section showed that 92 of 104 motor neuron classes establish gap junctions . This assessment excludes any gap junctions that might be developmentally specific (for example, see ). Although there are 25 innexin genes, only a subset of these are neuronally expressed. We sought to investigate if the scale of electrical synaptic specificity seen in the C. elegans nervous system could be explained through a model whereby gap junction formation between neighbors is restricted by the identity of expressed innexins.
Characterization of the unc-7 locus led to identification of multiple isoforms, offering the potential that isoforms could play different roles in determining synaptic specificity. Because unc-7 and unc-9 mutants are indistinguishable, it has long been thought that these genes may interact. The phenotype of unc-9 unc-7 double mutants is no more severe than either single mutant phenotype, consistent with the co-localization of UNC-9::GFP and UNC-7S. Experiments to dissect the nature of UNC-7 and UNC-9 interactions were governed by the complex nature of gap junctions, that is, a gap junction plaque may consist of hundreds of single channels, and co-localization of innexins might represent: individual homomeric channels coalesced in the same gap junction plaque; localization to different homomeric hemichannels in the same heterotypic channel; or heteromeric subunits in a single hemichannel. From the widespread and overlapping expression patterns of UNC-7S and UNC-9, it appeared likely that both of these innexins contribute subunits to most of the gap junctions in the locomotory nervous system.
Restricted expression of UNC-7S from the Punc-7S promoter allowed us to recognize AVB:B motor neuron gap junctions in live animals and has served as a useful tool for examining changes in synaptic connectivity . Our present analysis leads us to propose a model that these gap junctions are heterotypic for UNC-7S and UNC-9. Phenotypic rescue is commonly used as a measure of wild-type function, and expression of UNC-7S on the AVB side of these junctions was coincident with rescue of forward locomotion. However, use of heterologous promoters and genetic mosaic analysis indicated that rescue can be effected by UNC-7S expression in AVA, and, therefore, locomotion rescue is not a reliable measure of functional reconstitution of AVB:B gap junctions; other means had to be employed to assess the innexin composition of these channels.
Using unc-9 mutants and heterologous promoters, we showed that expression of UNC-9 in B class motor neurons is necessary to rescue the localization of UNC-7S expressed in AVB. A reciprocal dependence for UNC-9::GFP expressed in B motor neurons on AVB-expressed UNC-7S was found. This was somewhat surprising given that both UNC-7S and UNC-9 can form homomeric channels in Xenopus oocytes. Possibly in the respective mutant backgrounds homomeric channels may form but are not recognizable by our methods because they do not particularly stand out as brighter puncta offset from the ventral nerve cord near B cell bodies. If such is the case, it would suggest that the strength of electrical synapse (size and brightness of punctum) may be dependent on the proper composition and function of the gap junction channels formed between AVB and B motor neurons; little is known about what factors may regulate the size or positioning (cell soma or cell process) of gap junction plaques.
Although we found evidence that UNC-9 and UNC-7S are both expressed in AVB and B motor neurons, co-expression of UNC-7 isoforms and UNC-9 in the same cells showed little evidence of co-localization, and in Xenopus oocytes showed little evidence of association, suggesting that these innexins do not heteromerize in the same hemichannel. We therefore favor the model as depicted in Figure 11. This does not rule out a possible contribution of other innexins to these channels, and candidates include INX-19::GFP in AVA and AVB and INX-1::GFP in motor neurons. However, UNC-7S::GFP was found to properly localize to AVB:B motor neuron gap junction plaques in nsy-5/inx-19(tm1896) loss-of-function mutant animals, and although INX-1 co-localizes extensively with UNC-9::GFP in body wall muscles, it does not co-localize with UNC-7::GFP or UNC-9::GFP in the nerve cords (data not shown). Recently, it was shown that the Drosophila innexins 2 and 3 interact through their carboxyl termini in vitro and in vivo ; likewise, our GFP constructs suggest that the carboxyl terminus of innexins is necessary for localization into plaques, possibly due to an inability to oligomerize. Co-localization or binding studies would be useful to show whether other innexins might heteromerize with UNC-7S or UNC-9 and possibly contribute to AVB:B gap junctions.
Our analysis of gap junction formation focussed primarily on later larval stages and adults. At this stage animals are large enough such that the cell bodies of motor neurons in the ventral nerve cord are well spaced, making it less ambiguous in deciding if presumptive gap junction puncta are associated with a particular motor neuron. However, the locomotory nervous system undergoes significant changes late in the first larval stage, involving the wiring of emergent and the rewiring of extant motor neurons . Motor neurons at this stage appear to express at least four innexins, including inx-3 , unc-7, unc-9, and inx-1 (these studies). The relationship, if any, between these innexins and the rewiring involved is unknown. Understanding the relationship between UNC-7 and UNC-9 in establishing AVB:B motor neuron gap junctions found in later larval stages will provide a context for examining earlier developmental formation of electrical synapses.
Gap junction function
The heterotypic relationship between UNC-7S and UNC-9 can explain why unc-7 and unc-9 mutants share identical phenotypes; however, it is still uncertain which of the gap junctions they form are critical for locomotion. Because over- or mis-expression of UNC-7S driven by Punc-7S in interneurons rescues forward locomotion in e5 animals, it appears that any intra-class motor neuron junctions to which UNC-7 contributes may not be crucial for locomotion, or UNC-9 homotypic channels might compensate for the loss of UNC-7 in motor neurons. It is of interest to note that gap junctions between motor neurons have not been observed in the highly similar Ascaris locomotory nervous system [39, 40].
It was surprising that re-establishment of AVB:B motor neuron gap junctions was not implicated in the rescue of unc-7(e5) forward locomotion by unc-7S. Ablation of command interneurons by restricted expression of the human caspase ICE showed that even in the absence of interneuron input, worms can still move in a sinusoidal wave in a limited manner . A model has been proposed that control of locomotion in C. elegans can be regarded as a distributed bistable switch regulating the time durations worms move forward or backward [41, 42]. In such a model AVB:B gap junctions could play a role in maintaining the duration of forward locomotion or restricting the duration of backward locomotion; that is, AVB might be instructive to B class motor neurons or receptive to them. Here a comparison to Ascaris is of interest as well. Whereas in C. elegans forward locomotion is effected by a backwards propagating wave, Ascaris moves forward via forward-propagating waves . Although the classes and arrangement of motor neurons in both species are virtually identical, there may be underlying changes in interneuron function that contribute to this difference. AVB gap junctions with B motor neurons may reflect at least part of this difference.
How the heterotypic nature of AVB:B motor neuron gap junction channels influences their function is unknown, but we found that in Xenopus oocytes, UNC-7S:UNC-9 heterotypic channels are rectifying both in terms of gating and instantaneous current flow, a property not found for either homomeric channel. Without more detailed analyses of the properties of the AVB:B motor neuron synapse in vivo it is difficult to divine the potential significance of this rectifying behavior. Since gating is only seen when the UNC-7 cell is relatively hyperpolarized compared to the UNC-9 cell, this would ensure that the channels do not close when depolarizing impulses are passed from AVB to B motor neurons. However, the time constant of the gating of these channels is so slow that it is unlikely to be significant in the time frame of a neuronal impulse. The rectification of Gj0 would appear to favor conduction of depolarizing potentials from the motor neuron to AVB, rather than the reverse, but again the degree of rectification is minimal enough that it may not play a major role physiologically.
Electrical synapse specificity
Most motor neurons in the locomotory nervous system appear to express both UNC-7 and UNC-9. Examination of innexin expression patterns ( and these studies) provided only a small number of other candidates that might contribute to specificity in the locomotory nervous system. Although the unc-7 locus encodes three isoforms that differ in their amino termini, two of these appear functionally equivalent, and the ability of UNC-7L to contribute to junctions is still uncertain. (It is possible that UNC-7L requires processing or association with another innexin to be incorporated into junctions, or has another function altogether.) Therefore, the simple model that gap junction synaptic specificity is determined strictly by differential expression of innexins unique to particular neuron classes seems untenable. Questions remain concerning why neurons that apparently express similar innexins (the different motor neuron classes) rarely form gap junctions with one another, if gap junctions are subject to constant formation and reformation in the nervous system, and why there appears to be a consistency in subcellular localization (soma versus process) of certain gap junctions.
How synaptic specificity is achieved is poorly understood. Innexins UNC-7 and UNC-9 contribute to a large number of electrical synapses in the C. elegans locomotory nervous system. Examination of specific gap junctions between AVB interneurons and B class motor neurons indicated that these junctions are likely composed of heterotypic UNC-7S:UNC-9 gap junction channels, and the formation of these junctions specifically requires UNC-7S expression in AVB and UNC-9 expression in B class motor neurons. Co-expression of UNC-7 and UNC-9 in the same cells does not lead to heteromerization, and it is likely that most of the co-localization seen between these innexins represents heterotypic channels. Although interactions between UNC-7S and UNC-9 are critical for effecting electrical synaptic specificity, differential innexin expression is inadequate to account for the entirety of specificity observed among the interneurons and motor neurons involved in locomotion, and other factors must be involved. The ability to recognize specific electrical synapses may allow investigation of the factors determining how neurons recognize and establish gap junctions with their synaptic partners.
Materials and methods
Worms were cultured by standard techniques . Bristol strain N2 was used as wild type. Mutant strains of unc-7 X included: CB5 unc-7(e5), CB42 unc-7(e42), CB65 unc-7(e65), CB133 unc-7(e133), CB139 unc-7(e139), HH30 unc-7(hs9), HH34 unc-7(hs10), SP1376 lin-2(e1309) unc-7(mn382), SP1379 lin-2 unc-7(mn383), SP1380 unc-7(mn384), and SP1396 unc-7(mn409). Other strains used included CB1377 daf-6(e1377) X and CW129 unc-9(fc16) X. For transformation rescue, SP1531 ncl-1(e1865) unc-36(e251) III was sometimes used; the ncl-1 gene was incidental in these cases. Further information on transgenic strains provided on request.
A Bull's-Eye dye laser (Fryer, Huntley, IL, USA) excited by a VSL-337 nitrogen laser (Laser Science, Inc., Newton, MA, USA) was used on a Nikon Microphot FXA microscope to ablate AVA cells in L1 animals (for method, see ).
Anti-UNC-7 antibodies were generated against the carboxyl-terminal 88 amino acids of UNC-7 (S435-D522), and affinity-purified to GST::UNC-7 covalently cross-linked to glutathione beads). Injections and antisera collection were performed by Quality Controlled Biochemicals, Inc. (Hopkinton, MA, USA). Anti-Unc-7 antibodies were used at a 1:40 dilution.
To identify the unc-7S transcript, a cDNA library (gift of L Bell) synthesized using the FirstChoice RLM-RACE kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) was used for RNA ligase-mediated (RLM)-RACE amplification with unc-7 specific nested primers (5'-CAGTATGTGTTCTGTACC-3' and 5'-CATTGCAGGTCCGAACGC-3') according to the recommended protocol. The 5' end of unc-7S was identified as an SL1-spliced product with 94 nucleotides found in intron 3 (nucleotides 12,452-12,359) serving as exon 1. The predicted amino terminus sequence upstream of the canonical innexin start Met (5'-MYHSKQANTKYIKK AQKLLDGSHQLRIDSHHVGSAGHGAGQGHGHKKEFGPAMet) includes 14 amino acids unique to UNC-7S (in bold).
unc-7 DNA constructs and phenotypic analysis
Most unc-7 genomic constructs were made using subcloned fragments derived from cosmids F09B12 and R07D5. The unc-7S::gfp construct (Figure 3C) begins at the Sal I site in exon 2 (nucleotide 14,412 of R07D5) and extends to a blunt-ended Bam HI site (nucleotide 5,789). The GFP sequence (GFP [afmx)]; Affymax Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, USA) including a stop site was inserted into the Sal I site in exon 11 (nucleotides 8,828–8,833), resulting in deletion of 17 amino acids of the UNC-7 carboxyl terminus. This construct rescued forward locomotion when micro-injected at DNA concentrations ranging from 1–75 ng/μl. Derivatives of this basic construct included removal of the alternative exon 4 by deleting an Nhe I/Apa I fragment (nucleotides 12,259–12,543; Figure 3D); replacement of the genomic region covering exons 2–6 with the corresponding cDNA sequence (Sal I to Nco I; nucleotides 14,412–11,736; Figure 3E) plus additional upstream sequence to allow for recombination with F56B12 (to the Xho I site at nucleotide 15,574); and introduction of a Met to Leu mutation (M121L, ATG to CTG) by PCR amplification with primers that included the sequence change (nucleotides 11,968–11,970; Figure 3F). A fully-rescuing unc-7 construct (Figure 3B) extended to the Xho I site (nucleotide 15,574) and included a frameshift generated by filling in the Sal I site (nucleotide 14,412). To introduce GFP near TM4, a Bam HI site was introduced at the desired position (nucleotide 9,851) and GFP sequences including a translational stop site were cloned into the new site, resulting in deletion of 94 amino acids from the carboxyl terminus of UNC-7.
Phenotypic rescue of unc-7 by various constructs was assessed by tapping transformed animals on the nose or tail and observing whether or not smooth sinusoidal waves were propagated. unc-7 mutants typically cannot move more than one full body-length forward before assuming a severely kinked posture; in the reverse direction they initially produce smooth waves (usually of reduced amplitude compared to wild-type) but quickly display sharp kinks and stop progressing. Forward locomotion was considered rescued if animals could progress forward smoothly for at least several body lengths before showing signs of kinking. Many animals showed fairly long periods of forward movement before suffering a bout of spastic kinking, followed by progressive forward movement. A more precise analysis of the variations involved in rescue of locomotion was beyond the scope of this work.
Determination of the expression pattern of antibody- or GFP-labelled puncta (presumptive UNC-7-containing gap junctions) in various mutant backgrounds was based on examination of at least two (typically more) independently isolated transgenic lines for each condition. Mixed stage animal cultures were antibody-stained, and at least a dozen late larval stage animals (L3, L4) were examined for each line. Pictures used in figures show representative animals expressing constructs on extrachromosomal arrays for each condition.
unc-9 rescue and innexin::gfp constructions using long-range PCR
A plasmid encompassing the unc-9 gene from exon 4 to the polyadenylation site at nucleotide 12,661 of cosmid R12H7  was constructed in pBluescript (Stratagene, Cedar Creek, TX, USA) extending from the Kpn I site at nucleotides 8,959–8,964 to the Xba I site at nucleotides 14,519–14,524. A PCR product from nucleotide 4,178 of F09D5 (primer UNC-9A: 5'-TCAGACGCGATGTTTTGTAGGTGGG-3') to nucleotide 9,849 of cosmid R12H7 (Primer UNC-9B: 5'-CCACTTGATGTTTCACGTGTAGCGC-3') was amplified (Expand Long Template PCR System, Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA) from genomic DNA (14,678 nucleotides total length). The unc-9 plasmid and PCR product (50 ng/μl each) were co-injected into unc-9(fc16) animals. One rescued line, EH536, was maintained and used for genetic crosses involving unc-9(fc16).
To generate unc-9::gfp, an Nhe I site was generated at the carboxyl terminus of unc-9 (nucleotide 11,703) by amplifying with appropriate primers to include the Kpn I site at nucleotides 8,959–8,964 (UNC-9E: 5'-TGCTAGCCACGTCGTGCATTTTTCCTTCTTTATTG-3'; and UNC-9F: 5'-GTTGGGTACCTGCGACGTTCACCGAG-3'). The PCR product was cloned and the isolated Kpn I/Nhe I fragment then subcloned into a pBS sk- plasmid bearing a GFP (afmx) sequence with an Nhe I site at the translational start of GFP. The downstream sequences were PCR-amplified using a primer with an introduced Spe I site corresponding to the start of the 3' untranslated region at nucleotide 11,704 (UNC-9C: 5'-TTACTAGTTGACACACCCCAACTTCGTAGC), and a primer at nucleotides 12,836–12,860 (UNC-9D: 5'-CTAGTCTTTGCAGAGCAAGTGAGG-3'). This product was subcloned into the GFP vector as a Spe I fragment. To generate a full-length unc-9::gfp construct, the 14.7-kb UNC-9A+B PCR product (representing the 5' end of unc-9) and the unc-9::gfp plasmid were digested separately with Kpn I, digests electrophoresed through low-melt agarose (SeaPlaque GTG agarose, FMC, Rockland, ME, USA), and appropriate fragments purified by phenol extraction and ethanol precipitation. Approximately 0.6–1 μg of each fragment was used in a 20-μl ligation reaction, and 1 μl of ligation mix used for long-range PCR amplification with primers UNC-9A+ UNC-9D to produce a final 18.4-kb product. Reaction conditions followed the manufacturer's recommendations, with an annealing temperature of 63°C, an initial 15 minute extension time, and 10+18 cycles. This product was similarly purified in a low-melt agarose gel and used at 1 ng/μl along with 50 ng/μl of the unc-36(+) cosmid derivative RIp16 (gift of L Lobel) for microinjection into unc-36(-) animals. unc-9Δ::gfp was generated by cloning an unc-9 PCR-amplified genomic fragment (5'-GGATCCAATGTTGGGTACCTGCGAC-3' and 5'-ACCGGTAGTTCTCCGGCGTGAGTTGC-3') into the Bam HI/Age I sites of the GFP translational fusion vector pPD95.77 (provided by A Fire). Long-range unc-9Δ::gfp PCR products for micro-injections were similarly PCR-amplified from ligations using the UNC-9A primer plus a primer specific to pPD95.77 (5'-TTGCTACAGGCATCGTGGTGTCACG-3').
For inx-19, an Xho I site was introduced at nucleotides 11,041–11,046 (of cosmid T16H5) in a plasmid that included 1,565 nucleotides 5' and 2,042 nucleotides 3' to this site. A GFP sequence amplified from pPD114.24 (provided by A Fire) with flanking Sal I sites and including a translational stop site was subcloned into the Xho I site; the resultant construct is predicted to delete 98 amino acids from the carboxyl terminus of INX-19. To generate the full-length GFP construct, the upstream region of inx-19 was amplified as a 13.2-kb PCR product (extending to nucleotide 10,910 of T16H5), digested with Aat II (nucleotides 9,571–9,576), purified, and ligated to Aat II-digested inx-19::gfp plasmid for long-range PCR amplification to generate a final product of approximately 16.2 kb. This product was purified and injected at a concentration of 20 ng/μl along with 50 ng/μl RIp16.
For inx-1, a 4.3-kb Bam HI/Pst I fragment encompassing the 3' end of the gene was cloned (nucleotides 13,651-9,385 of cosmid C16E9). GFP (afmx) with a translational stop site was inserted into the Mlu I site (nucleotides 11,244-11,239) of this fragment, resulting in the predicted truncation of 15 amino acids from the carboxyl terminus of INX-1. For long-range PCR GFP construction, nucleotides 25,162–12,329 of C16E9 and inx-1::gfp plasmid sequences including nucleotides 13,651-9,702 were amplified in separate reactions, digested with Sex AI (nucleotides 12,686–12,692), purified, ligated, and amplified to give a final 16.3-kb PCR product. Final product (10 or 30 ng/μl) was co-injected with 50 ng/μl RIp16. For inx-4, nucleotides 18,920-17,135 and 17,155-13,093 of cosmid F26D11 were cloned upstream (Kpn I/Nhe I fragment) and downstream (Spe I/Sac II fragment) of GFP in a GFP vector (GFP [afmx]-B) by virtue of introduced Nhe I, Spe I and Sac II sites. The resultant construct is predicted to delete 138 amino acids from the carboxyl terminus of INX-4. To generate the long-range PCR GFP product, upstream sequences covering nucleotides 26,894-13,521 of F26D11 were amplified, digested with Kpn I (nucleotides 18,901-18,896), the appropriate 8-kb fragment purified and ligated to Kpn I-digested inx-4::gfp plasmid, and the final 14.6-kb product amplified from the ligation mix. This fragment (20 ng/μl) was co-injected with 50 ng/μl RIp16 for transformation rescue.
A cassette for driving expression of UNC-7S::GFP from heterologous promoters was made by blunt-end cloning a 5.3-kb Sca I/Bam HI fragment from cosmid F09B12 containing the 3' end of the unc-7 gene, inserting GFP amplified from pPD114.24 (provided by A Fire) into the Sal I site near the 3' end of the unc-7 coding region, and then inserting the 5' coding region with a Bam HI/Sgr AI fragment obtained from the pCS2+U7S construct used for expression in Xenopus ooctyes. The resultant plasmid therefore includes the cDNA sequence for the coding region of UNC-7S plus native 3' untranslated region sequences. The only introns present are those found in the GFP sequences. For all promoter fusions the first intron/exon splice site (or S1 trans-splice site) of the heterologous gene was included on the PCR-amplified promoter fragment.
To show that this construct could rescue forward locomotion in unc-7 animals, a 2-kb presumptive promoter region of UNC-7S (Punc-7S) was PCR-amplified (primers 5'-AAGGATCCTCACATATTCAAATTCAAGAGATC-3' and 5'-AACCGCGGAACAAATATCAGGAAACTGCGCTC-3') and inserted as a Sac II/Bam HI fragment into the cassette; the construct (Punc-7S::unc-7S::GFP) rescued after micro-injection at a concentration of 25 ng/μl into unc-7(e5) animals. A translational fusion of Punc-7S in the GFP expression vector pPD95.67 (provided by A Fire) was injected at a concentration of 50 ng/μl and found to express in various head neurons but not in ventral nerve cord motor neurons.
Other presumptive promoters tested included that for sra-11 (Psra-11::unc-7S::gfp), inserted as a 5.1-kb Bam HI fragment (amplified with primers 5'-AGACTTCGACAGTTCAAGCTCTCGG-3' and 5'-GTTGTCATGGATCCTAGCTGAAATATAAGGG-3') and micro-injected at 10–100 ng/μl; acr-5 (Pacr-5::unc-7S;;gfp), inserted as a 4.4-kb Sac II/Bam HI fragment (primers 5'-GAGAAAGAGAAGCGCCGCGGCTCAG-3' and 5'-ACTCTGCTACCGGATCCACAGGAGC-3') and micro-injected at 10–25 ng/μl; and cex-1 (Pcex-1::unc-7S::gfp), inserted as a 1-kb Sac II/Bam HI fragment (primers 5'-CCGCGGTTTGTCGTGTTCCAAACAGAAGC-3' and 5'-TGCAACAACCAATTCTGAAAGTATAAGATTTGACTG-3') and micro-injected at 100 ng/μl.
Expression of UNC-9 under control of the acr-5 promoter (Pacr-5::unc-9) was achieved by PCR-amplifying the unc-9 coding region (primers 5'-CTAGTCTTTGCAGAGCAAGTGAGG-3' and 5'-CCGTCACGACATGACTTAGGATGAG-3') and cloning this 4.5-kb product into the Eco RV site of pBS in an orientation allowing for insertion of Sac II/Bam HI heterologous promoter fragments. An unc-9::gfp expression cassette was made by introduction of GFP (afmx) from the partially rescuing unc-9::gfp genomic construct (above).
For many of the heterologous promoter fusions, the plasmid JA-1  was used as a co-injected marker at a concentration of 100 ng/μl. JA-1 is a col-19::gfp construct expressed in adults, thus allowing for examination of unc-7::gfp localization in larval stages.
Constructs for Xenopus oocyte expression
A full-length version of UNC-7 (pCS2+U7L) was PCR-amplified and cloned into Bam HI/Eco RI-digested pCS2+ [47, 48] with primers 5'-GGATCCATGCTCGGCTCCTCCAGC-3' and 5'-GAATTCTCAGTCTATCGTCCCTTG-3'; a full-length UNC-9 insert was generated by amplifying the coding region from a total RNA preparation using nested primers (final pair 5'-CCGTCACGACATGACTTAGG-3' and 5'-GGTGTGTCACACGTCGTGC-3'), cloning the final PCR product into Eco RV-digested, T-tailed pBluescript (Stratagene), and subcloning into pCS2+ as a Bam HI/Xho I fragment (pCS2+U9). To express UNC-7S, pCS2+U7L was double-digested with Sna BI and Xho I to remove the Xba I site in pCS2+, and a 5'-RACE product representing the 5' end of UNC-7S was inserted as a Bam HI/Xba I restriction fragment to create pCS2+U7S.
Gap junction channel formation in Xenopus oocytes
cRNA was prepared using SP6 mMessage mMachine kit of Ambion Inc. Oocytes were treated as previously described  and coinjected with 20–40 ng of innexin RNA mixed with 4 ng of antisense oligonucleotide directed against nucleotides -5–25 of endogenous Xenopus Cx38 .
Approximately 48 h after injection, oocytes were stripped of their vitelline membrane and paired overnight in agar wells. Oocytes were continuously bathed in half-strength L15 media (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA). Junctional currents were assessed using the dual oocyte voltage clamp technique as described previously . Oocytes were clamped at approximately -30 mV using two Geneclamp500 Amplifiers (Axon Instruments, La Jolla, CA, USA). One cell was then pulsed in 10 mV increments to establish Vj s up to ± 100 mV. Data were acquired and analyzed using Pclamp8 software (Axon Instruments).
In vitro translation
In vitro-translated cRNA (100 ng/μl) was mixed in 50 μl rabbit reticulocyte lysates (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and incubated (30°C, 90 minutes) with 15 mCi/ml [35S]methionine (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ, USA). The in vitro-translated products were separated by 12.5% SDS-PAGE and the dried gel imaged with a Phosphoimager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).
unc-124(hs10) is an allele of unc-7
unc-124(hs10) was originally isolated as a cold-sensitive (cs) unc mapping to the left arm of chromosome X between dpy-8 and unc-10, at approximately 2.4 cM; unc-7 maps to the right arm of X at +22 cM. unc-124 was reported to display hetero-allelic non-complementation with unc-7; that is, unc-124 +/+ unc-7 animals were reported to be cs Unc [21, 50]. We carried out a non-complementation screen for new alleles of unc-124 and identified four new mutations. All of these mutations mapped to the right of unc-3 (+21.3 cM) and were presumed to be new alleles of unc-7. A failure to identify new unc-124 alleles led us to sequence the unc-7 coding region cloned from unc-124(hs10) mutants (strain HH34), and a TGC to TAC change (C238Y) in the predicted second TM domain of UNC-7 was identified. Two other strains carrying the unc-124(hs10) mutation have been deposited with the C. elegans Genetic Center, and we sequenced the unc-7 region in HH123 unc-2(e55) unc-124(hs10) and HH132 dpy-8(e130) unc-124(hs10); the same unc-7 mutation was identified in both strains.
To verify that hs10 mapped to the unc-7 locus, HH123 and HH132 hermaphrodites were crossed to N2 males, resultant cross-progeny hermaphrodites back-crossed to N2 males, and wild type and recombinant non-Dpy 'Unc-124' or non-Unc-2 'Unc-124' males grown and scored at 15°C. For ++/unc-2 unc-124 crosses, 111 wild type and 58 non-Unc-2 Unc-124 males were counted, placing unc-2 34.3 cM from unc-124, which positions hs10 very close to unc-7 and quite distant from its original mapped location. For ++/dpy-8 unc-124 crosses, 132 wild type and 41 non-Dpy Unc-124 males were counted, placing dpy-8 23.7 cM from hs10, and again positioning hs10 very close to unc-7.
Was it possible that the original HH34 strain was a double mutant that carried mutations in both unc-124 and unc-7? To test this, HH34 males were crossed to dpy-8 lin-2 hermaphrodites at 25°C. dpy-8 maps at position -6.2 cM and lin-2 at +7.0 cM. Heterozygous non-Dpy non-Lin hermaphrodite cross progeny were grown at the restrictive temperature (15°C), and non-Dpy Lin segregants were identified and isolated. Broods from these animals grown at 15°C were later examined for the presence of any animals displaying a kinker (Unc-124-like) phenotype. In two separate experiments, a total of 29 non-Dpy Lin animals were isolated and none of them segregated any progeny displaying a kinker phenotype. We conclude that there is no Unc mutation that maps to the left of lin-2 in unc-124(hs10) strains currently held at the C. elegans Genetic Center, and that hs10 is an allele of unc-7.
Genetic mosaics identify the AB lineage as the focus of action for unc-9
Mosaic analysis of unc-9 followed the same strategy used for unc-7 . The genetic markers employed were used to distinguish early duplication losses from the founder cell AB (giving rise to nearly all non-pharyngeal neurons), or P1 (giving rise to the germ line as well as all but one of the 95 body wall muscle cells). Two different strains were used. SP800 was of genotype unc-93(e1500) III; unc-9(e101) unc-3(e151) sup-10 (mn219) osm-1(p808) X; mnDp3 (X, f) [unc-9(+) unc-3(+) sup-10(+) osm-1(+)]. unc-93(e1500) confers a gain-of-function rubberband phenotype that is suppressed by the recessive sup-10 (mn219) mutation. The focus of action of the e1500 rubberband phenotype is the body wall muscles – when the sup-10(+) free duplication mnDp3 is present in body wall muscles, the animals have a rubberband phenotype due to unc-93. If in a rare mitotic event mnDp3 is lost in the lineage giving rise to body wall muscles, animals will be wild type due to recessive suppression by sup-10. unc-3 animals are severe Unc coilers, and unc-3 is epistatic to unc-9; the focus of action of unc-3 is widely distributed in the ABp lineage. The focus of action of osm-1 is in sensory neurons associated with amphids and phasmids that also derive from AB. We used SP800 to screen for rare non-Unc-3 non-Unc-93 non-Osm-1 animals. These animals are predicted to maintain mnDp3 in the AB lineage (non-Unc-3 and non-Osm-1 phenotypes) but will have lost mnDp3 in the P1 lineage (non-Unc-93 because loss of mnDp3 from body wall muscles allows the recessive sup-10 mutation to suppress unc-93). Further verification of the loss of mnDp3 from P1 is the absence of mnDp3 from any of the progeny (that is, all progeny are expected to be Unc-3 Osm-1 non-Unc-93). We screened approximately 10,000 animals and identified 7 hermaphrodites that were non-Unc-3 non-Unc-93 non-Osm-1 and gave rise to broods that showed only Unc-3 progeny (osm-1 was not scored in the broods). None of these seven animals displayed an Unc-9 phenotype, suggesting that the focus of action of unc-9 is not in the P1 derived lineage, and that mnDp3 maintained in the AB lineage of these animals rescued the unc-9 mutation.
The second strain employed was of genotype unc-9(e120) daf-6(e1377) sup-10(n983); mnDp3 [unc-9(+) daf-6(+) sup-10(+)]. The gain-of-function sup-10(n983) allele  confers a rubberband phenotype with focus of action in body wall muscles ; the focus of action of daf-6 is in the amphid and phasmid sheath cells that derive from ABp , and daf-6 animals are defective in the dye-filling (Dyf phenotype) of sensory neurons associated with these structures. This strain gives rise to wild-type (carrying mnDp3) and Unc-9 Rubberband (lacking mnDp3) progeny. If the unc-9 focus of action is derived from AB, we expected to find rare Unc-9 non-Rubberband animals arising from loss of mnDp3 only in the AB lineage. Such animals were expected to be non-Rubberband because mnDp3 complements the sup-10 mutation in the body wall muscles, dye-filling defective because of the ABp focus of daf-6, and to give rise to both wild-type and Unc Rubberband progeny because of maintenance of mnDp3 in the germline derived from P1 descendants. Of approximately 15,000 animals screened, 2 were identified that met the criteria of being Unc-9 non-Rubberband Dyf and giving rise to both wild-type and Unc Rubberband progeny. Additionally, six were identified as Unc-9 non-Rubberband non-Dyf, giving rise to both wild-type and Unc Rubberband progeny. Five of the latter were classified as exhibiting a weaker Unc-9 phenotype. We interpret the latter group as potentially representing losses of mnDp3 within the ABa lineage, or representing a more complex pattern of mosaicism within the ABp lineage that maintains mnDp3 in the amphid and phasmid sheath cells.
Although the focus of action of unc-9 cannot be precisely determined from these mosaic experiments, the results are consistent with the interpretation that loss of unc-9(+) function from the P1 lineage can be tolerated without apparent effects on locomotion, and that the loss of unc-9(+) function from within the AB lineage gives rise to the Unc-9 phenotype.
green fluorescent protein
rapid amplification of cDNA ends.
We wish to thank Robert K Herman and David Greenstein for critical review of the manuscript, Ross Johnson and Judd Sheridan for invaluable discussions related to gap junctions, and Edward Yeh and Mei Zhen for sharing information prior to publication. Some nematode strains used in this work were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, which is funded by the NIH National Center for Research Resources (NCRR). This work was supported by NIH GM56367 and MMF 3183923802 to JES, and NIGMS GM055437 to BJN.
- Phelan P, Starich TA: Innexins get into the gap. Bioessays. 2001, 23: 388-396.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Phelan P: Innexins: members of an evolutionarily conserved family of gap-junction proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005, 1711: 225-245.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hua VB, Chang AB, Tchieu JH, Kumar NM, Nielsen PA, Saier MH: Sequence and phylogenetic analyses of 4 TMS junctional proteins of animals: connexins, innexins, claudins and occludins. J Membr Biol. 2003, 194: 59-76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bruzzone R, Hormuzdi SG, Barbe MT, Herb A, Monyer H: Pannexins, a family of gap junction proteins expressed in brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 13644-13649.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Panchin Y, Kelmanson I, Matz M, Lukyanov K, Usman N, Lukyanov S: A ubiquitous family of putative gap junction molecules. Curr Biol. 2000, 10: R473-474.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sasakura Y, Shoguchi E, Takatori N, Wada S, Meinertzhagen IA, Satou Y, Satoh N: A genomewide survey of developmentally relevant genes in Ciona intestinalis. X. Genes for cell junctions and extracellular matrix. Dev Genes Evol. 2003, 213: 303-313.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barrio LC, Suchyna T, Bargiello T, Xu LX, Roginski RS, Bennett MV, Nicholson BJ: Gap junctions formed by connexins 26 and 32 alone and in combination are differently affected by applied voltage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991, 88: 8410-8414.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Phelan P, Stebbings LA, Baines RA, Bacon JP, Davies JA, Ford C: Drosophila Shaking-B protein forms gap junctions in paired Xenopus oocytes. Nature. 1998, 391: 181-184.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Starich TA, Herman RK, Shaw JE: Molecular and genetic analysis of unc-7, a Caenorhabditis elegans gene required for coordinated locomotion. Genetics. 1993, 133: 527-541.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rash JE, Dillman RK, Bilhartz BL, Duffy HS, Whalen LR, Yasumura T: Mixed synapses discovered and mapped throughout mammalian spinal cord. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93: 4235-4239.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Condorelli DF, Parenti R, Spinella F, Trovato Salinaro A, Belluardo N, Cardile V, Cicirata F: Cloning of a new gap junction gene (Cx36) highly expressed in mammalian brain neurons. Eur J Neurosci. 1998, 10: 1202-1208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Galarreta M, Hestrin S: Electrical synapses between GABA-releasing interneurons. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001, 2: 425-433.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- White JG, Southgate E, Thomson JN, Brenner S: The structure of the nervous system of Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1986, 314: 1-340.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bruzzone R, White TW, Paul DL: Expression of chimeric connexins reveals new properties of the formation and gating behavior of gap junction channels. J Cell Sci. 1994, 107: 955-967.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chalfie M, White J: The nervous system. The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Edited by: Wood WB. 1988, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 337-391.Google Scholar
- Chalfie M, Sulston JE, White JG, Southgate E, Thomson JN, Brenner S: The neural circuit for touch sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 1985, 5: 956-964.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wicks SR, Rankin CH: Integration of mechanosensory stimuli in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 1995, 15: 2434-2444.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McIntire SL, Jorgensen E, Kaplan J, Horvitz HR: The GABAergic nervous system of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 1993, 364: 337-341.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duerr JS, Gaskin J, Rand JB: Identified neurons in C. elegans coexpress vesicular transporters for acetylcholine and monoamines. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001, 280: C1616-1622.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stretton A, Donmoyer J, Davis R, Meade J, Cowden C, Sithigorngul P: Motor behavior and motor nervous system function in the nematode Ascaris suum. J Parasitol. 1992, 78: 206-214.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barnes TM, Hekimi S: The Caenorhabditis elegans avermectin resistance and anesthetic response gene unc-9 encodes a member of a protein family implicated in electrical coupling of excitable cells. J Neurochem. 1997, 69: 2251-2260.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- WORMBASE. [http://wormbase.org]
- Chuang CF, Vanhoven MK, Fetter RD, Verselis VK, Bargmann CI: An innexin-dependent cell network establishes left-right neuronal asymmetry in C. elegans. Cell. 2007, 129: 787-799.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Starich T, Sheehan M, Jadrich J, Shaw J: Innexins in C. elegans. Cell Commun Adhes. 2001, 8: 311-314.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu Q, Chen B, Gaier E, Joshi J, Wang ZW: Low conductance gap junctions mediate specific electrical coupling in body-wall muscle cells of Caenorhabditis elegans. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 7881-7889.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen B, Liu Q, Ge Q, Xie J, Wang ZW: UNC-1 regulates gap junctions important to locomotion in C. elegans. Curr Biol. 2007, 17: 1334-1339.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perkins LA, Hedgecock EM, Thomson JN, Culotti JG: Mutant sensory cilia in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1986, 117: 456-487.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller DM, Shen MM, Shamu CE, Burglin TR, Ruvkun G, Dubois ML, Ghee M, Wilson L: C. elegans unc-4 gene encodes a homeodomain protein that determines the pattern of synaptic input to specific motor neurons. Nature. 1992, 355: 841-845.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Von Stetina SE, Fox RM, Watkins KL, Starich TA, Shaw JE, Miller DM: UNC-4 represses CEH-12/HB9 to specify synaptic inputs to VA motor neurons in C. elegans. Genes Dev. 2007, 21: 332-346.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Winnier AR, Meir JY, Ross JM, Tavernarakis N, Driscoll M, Ishihara T, Katsura I, Miller DM: UNC-4/UNC-37-dependent repression of motor neuron-specific genes controls synaptic choice in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Dev. 1999, 13: 2774-2786.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Troemel ER, Chou JH, Dwyer ND, Colbert HA, Bargmann CI: Divergent seven transmembrane receptors are candidate chemosensory receptors in C. elegans. Cell. 1995, 83: 207-218.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Landesman Y, White TW, Starich TA, Shaw JE, Goodenough DA, Paul DL: Innexin-3 forms connexin-like intercellular channels. J Cell Sci. 1999, 112: 2391-2396.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stebbings LA, Todman MG, Phelan P, Bacon JP, Davies JA: Two Drosophila innexins are expressed in overlapping domains and cooperate to form gap-junction channels. Mol Biol Cell. 2000, 11: 2459-2470.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suchyna TM, Nitsche JM, Chilton M, Harris AL, Veenstra RD, Nicholson BJ: Different ionic selectivities for connexins 26 and 32 produce rectifying gap junction channels. Biophys J. 1999, 77: 2968-2987.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gonzalez D, Gomez-Hernandez JM, Barrio LC: Molecular basis of voltage dependence of connexin channels: an integrative appraisal. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2007, 94: 66-106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lehmann C, Lechner H, Loer B, Knieps M, Herrmann S, Famulok M, Bauer R, Hoch M: Heteromerization of innexin gap junction proteins regulates epithelial tissue organization in Drosophila. Mol Biol Cell. 2006, 17: 1676-1685.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sulston JE, Horvitz HR: Post-embryonic cell lineages of the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1977, 56: 110-156.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Starich TA, Miller A, Nguyen RL, Hall DH, Shaw JE: The Caenorhabditis elegans innexin INX-3 is localized to gap junctions and is essential for embryonic development. Dev Biol. 2003, 256: 403-417.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Angstadt JD, Donmoyer JE, Stretton AO: Retrovesicular ganglion of the nematode Ascaris. J Comp Neurol. 1989, 284: 374-388.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Davis RE, Stretton AO: The motornervous system of Ascaris : electrophysiology and anatomy of the neurons and their control by neuromodulators. Parasitology. 1996, 113 (Suppl): S97-117.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zheng Y, Brockie PJ, Mellem JE, Madsen DM, Maricq AV: Neuronal control of locomotion in C. elegans is modified by a dominant mutation in the GLR-1 ionotropic glutamate receptor. Neuron. 1999, 24: 347-361.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsalik EL, Hobert O: Functional mapping of neurons that control locomotory behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurobiol. 2003, 56: 178-197.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kobayashi Y, Bando T: Studies on the locomotion of Ascaris suilla and lumbricoides observed in the glass tube, and the influence of Santonin. Proc Japan Acad. 1950, 26: 72-77.Google Scholar
- Sulston J, Hodgkin J: Methods. The Nematode Caenorthabditis elegans. Edited by: Wood WB. 1988, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 587-606.Google Scholar
- Bargmann CI, Avery L: Laser killing of cells in Caenorhabditis elegans. Methods Cell Biol. 1995, 48: 225-250.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abrahante JE, Miller EA, Rougvie AE: Identification of heterochronic mutants in Caenorhabditis elegans. Temporal misexpression of a collagen::green fluorescent protein fusion gene. Genetics. 1998, 149: 1335-1351.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rupp RA, Snider L, Weintraub H: Xenopus embryos regulate the nuclear localization of XMyoD. Genes Dev. 1994, 8: 1311-1323.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Turner DL, Weintraub H: Expression of achaete-scute homolog 3 in Xenopus embryos converts ectodermal cells to a neural fate. Genes Dev. 1994, 8: 1434-1447.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Skerrett IM, Merritt M, Zhou L, Zhu H, Cao F, Smith JF, Nicholson BJ: Applying the Xenopus oocyte expression system to the analysis of gap junction proteins. Methods Mol Biol. 2001, 154: 225-249.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hecht RM, Norman MA, Vu T, Jones W: A novel set of uncoordinated mutants in Caenorhabditis elegans uncovered by cold-sensitive mutations. Genome. 1996, 39: 459-464.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Greenwald I, Horvitz HR: A visible allele of the muscle gene sup-10× of C. elegans. Genetics. 1986, 113: 63-72.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Villeneuve AM, Meyer BJ: The role of sdc-1 in the sex determination and dosage compensation decisions in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1990, 124: 91-114.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Herman RK: Mosaic analysis of two genes that affect nervous system structure in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1987, 116: 377-388.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.